Full Text

 

News

An Open Letter to President Biden

Charlene M. Woodcock
Wednesday September 28, 2022 - 09:56:00 PM

It is all too clear to many of us that the human race is doomed to an increasingly hostile environment unless we find a leader who will convince the Congress to break the iron grip of the military-industrial complex and the fossil fuel industry on our lives and our world.
The highly partisan Supreme Court has given corporations nearly unlimited power, and this is destroying American lives every day.
If the U.S. government continues to lavish funds on the Pentagon and facilitate depredations by the fossil fuel industry, the destruction of our unique habitat on this beautiful small planet will increase.
A strong majority of U.S. voters elected you to one of the most potentially effective positions in the world. U.S. citizens, with your support, are rediscovering the power of membership and action in unions. And adults and youth around the world are joining demonstrations to express their deep alarm at the fast-moving changes in our climate and consequent terribly costly extreme weather.
Members of a new generation in Congress, working with Senator Bernie Sanders, are showing the sane, responsible way forward. With your active leadership we can finally change policy from the longtime, increasingly dangerous, service to corporations and the wealthy to a federal government that serves the needs of the people.
Your deep history with the Congress provides a foundation from which you can convey the extreme urgency of ending government funding for military instead of diplomatic foreign policy and ending financial support and permissions for the mining, transport, and burning of fossil fuels.
Will you be the leader we urgently need at this crucial point in our history?


Sister Cities: An Open Letter to Mayor Arreguin and City Council:

Phil Allen, D-1 resident
Wednesday September 28, 2022 - 12:48:00 PM

It hardly seems possible that until seven or so months ago, before the new website was installed, the city’s involvement with its sister cities—all 17 of them at the time—was mere. Occasional visits by informal delegations or building volunteers sent hither might make it to the inner pages of local papers, but a more overt recognition at events, festivals or other civic doings, in a city with a global affect far beyond its size, was hard to find. Their once stalwart promoters had vanished. Sisters Cities International did not admit to having Berkeley as a member!

They have since had a noticeable if brief return from the backwaters of public attention. Those who use our new city website will find them displayed with some prominence under ‘Your Government’, in the form of a dry asterisked roster.

Those asterisks stand for recently dismissed ‘sisters’—the two in Russia. On June 28, the Council unanimously passed (on consent) Resolution 70,437 in reaction to the on-going—now stalled—invasion of Ukraine. Apparently, severing ties however tenuous with a Moscow suburb (Dmitrov) and a major hub near Lake Baikal (Ulan-Ude) backs some assertion that cities create foreign policy and conduct wars, or are directly approving and complicit.

Anticipating such, the SCI Political Suspension/Cancellation Policy states: “ ... the suspension of a sister city relationship due to disagreement over a government policy or practice can be counterproductive and contrary to the stated mission of sister city relationships promoting “peace through mutual respect, understanding, and cooperation—one individual, one community at a time.” Suspending sister city relationships closes a channel of communication through which meaningful dialogue may be held.” 

In a wholly different response, Portland Oregon has maintained an active relationship with its far-eastern sister Khabarovsk, which has been taken to task for its vociferous anti-Putin stands. 

Why does Berkeley maintain this sentimental and toothless farce to the point of elevation to prominence on the new website? Before Ukraine kicks out Russia and the two banished sisters are sheepishly extended offers of resumption, the condition and future of all these essentially dormant relationships should be considered by the appropriate civic bodies, with input from the whole town as well as the existing original promoters. If active symbiosis is once again set aside, then drop the entire pretense. 

I for one do not wish to see our sister-city (or sister-tribe, -district, -people) accords vanquished or forgotten. Thinking globally is a municipal given. Berkeley is not an island; we strive to connect. Our first sister—Sakai, Japan (1966)—was a city of a wartime enemy. Since, we have embraced the causes of beset communities in South Africa, Palestine, Latin America, Oceania, even California—almost anywhere you look. (The two Russian cities are not exactly ‘beset’.) 

With the makeover of Civic Center Park and surrounding architecture at hand, such re-invigorated relationships could be permanently commemorated, perhaps in the form of a brass compass rose which would show name, direction and distance of each and all (re)welcomed sisters. 

The future of our sister-city accords, due in part to a grim invasion and a park makeover, deserves a fresh appraisal. 

 

 

Phil Allen 

D-1 resident 

 

 

 

Open Letter to the Mayor and City Council of Berkeley 

It hardly seems possible that until seven or so months ago, before the new website was installed, the city’s involvement with its sister cities—all 17 of them at the time—was mere. Occasional visits by informal delegations or building volunteers sent hither might make it to the inner pages of local papers, but a more overt recognition at events, festivals or other civic doings, in a city with a global affect far beyond its size, was hard to find. Their once stalwart promoters had vanished. Sisters Cities International did not admit to having Berkeley as a member! 

They have since had a noticeable if brief return from the backwaters of public attention. Those who use our new city website will find them displayed with some prominence under ‘Your Government’, in the form of a dry asterisked roster. 

Those asterisks stand for recently dismissed ‘sisters’—the two in Russia. On June 28, the Council unanimously passed (on consent) Resolution 70,437 in reaction to the on-going—now stalled—invasion of Ukraine. Apparently, severing ties however tenuous with a Moscow suburb (Dmitrov) and a major hub near Lake Baikal (Ulan-Ude) backs some assertion that cities create foreign policy and conduct wars, or are directly approving and complicit. 

Anticipating such, the SCI Political Suspension/Cancellation Policy states: “ ... the suspension of a sister city relationship due to disagreement over a government policy or practice can be counterproductive and contrary to the stated mission of sister city relationships promoting “peace through mutual respect, understanding, and cooperation—one individual, one community at a time.” Suspending sister city relationships closes a channel of communication through which meaningful dialogue may be held.” 

In a wholly different response, Portland Oregon has maintained an active relationship with its far-eastern sister Khabarovsk, which has been taken to task for its vociferous anti-Putin stands. 

Why does Berkeley maintain this sentimental and toothless farce to the point of elevation to prominence on the new website? Before Ukraine kicks out Russia and the two banished sisters are sheepishly extended offers of resumption, the condition and future of all these essentially dormant relationships should be considered by the appropriate civic bodies, with input from the whole town as well as the existing original promoters. If active symbiosis is once again set aside, then drop the entire pretense. 

I for one do not wish to see our sister-city (or sister-tribe, -district, -people) accords vanquished or forgotten. Thinking globally is a municipal given. Berkeley is not an island; we strive to connect. Our first sister—Sakai, Japan (1966)—was a city of a wartime enemy. Since, we have embraced the causes of beset communities in South Africa, Palestine, Latin America, Oceania, even California—almost anywhere you look. (The two Russian cities are not exactly ‘beset’.) 

With the makeover of Civic Center Park and surrounding architecture at hand, such re-invigorated relationships could be permanently commemorated, perhaps in the form of a brass compass rose which would show name, direction and distance of each and all (re)welcomed sisters. 

The future of our sister-city accords, due in part to a grim invasion and a park makeover, deserves a fresh appraisal. 

 

 

 

 

 


Opinion

Editorials

R.I.P. Progressive Berkeley

Becky O'Malley
Tuesday September 27, 2022 - 03:17:00 PM

Whatever happened to local government?

When we moved to Berkeley, way back in 1973, there were vigorous contests for the at-large seats on the city council and for the mayor. We’d spent the sixties in Ann Arbor, where there were also vigorous contests, with issues revolving around civil rights, especially the ultimately successful attempt to outlaw racial discrimination in local housing. Yes, this was the north and the 1960s, but housing discrimination was alive and well, even in a northern college town like Ann Arbor, and school integration was very much a work in progress. I had the privilege of managing the city council campaign of the first successful African American candidate since reconstruction in the 19th century, and also, not so successfully, of working on the losing campaign of a quasi-socialist candidate for mayor, who did get about 5% of the vote in 1972, as well as Shirley Chisholm’s Michigan campaign for President, another 5%.

There were few if any town-gown disputes.

Mid-century Berkeley was livelier, on-campus and off. The University of California administrators have traditionally loved picking fights with faculty (the loyalty oath) and students (free speech), and also with local residents (taking and demolishing private homes by eminent domain)

Even without the university, local issues such as community control of the police and neighborhood preservation, which were supported by progressive configurations like the April Coalition and Berkeley Citizens’ Action, made Berkeley elections and council meetings lively. Gory details, which included recalls and rowdy meetings, can be found online in the late David Mundstock’s splendid history, Berkeley in the 70s. 

In those days, the “progressive” city council faction routinely sided with the citizenry in opposition to the university’s edifice complex, which was more often championed by the traditional Democrats who were then called “moderates”. Councilmember (later Mayor, Assemblymember and Senator) Loni Hancock was one of the authors of the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance. Her colleague Nancy Skinner was marketed as an environmentalist when she was elected at large as the first (and only) student to be a Berkeley councilmember. 

How times have changed. Now Skinner is hand-in-glove with State Senator Scott Wiener and Oakland/Berkeley State Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, all of whom are busy re-jiggering state law for their developer contributors, so that cities and towns have less and less control over local planning. Loni Hancock is now married to former developer and mayor Tom Bates and is no longer a neighborhood advocate.. 

Berkeley is becoming populated with buildings which can only be described as warehouses to store the enormous number of students being added to the university. UC is engaged in unabashed real estate speculation, a national phenomenon in what used to be called “college towns” which has been well documented by Professor Davarian Baldwin. Here’s his take on this sordid story as it plays out in Berkeley: 

 

The big ugly box buildings we’re getting here in Berkeley are described as offering “market rate” apartments, but their developers benefit handsomely from the captive market which has been artificially created by their major investor, the university. 

And thanks to a spate of Wienerite legislation, developers and their elected allies are busily depriving local governments of control over how their localities are densified. Quotas are set externally, and if they are not met cities lose their power to set building standards. The result is that citizens are less and less interested in participating in the shell civic entities which are left. 

Berkeley, e.g., has four of our nine council seats (eight districts and the mayor) open in theory, but two of the incumbents are running uncontested. Nobody much cares.  

It’s happening all over. In a number of Bay Area cities (Danville, Lafayette and others) only one candidate has filed for a district council seat, so the election is cancelled and that single candidate is simply appointed to the seat. This looks to me a lot like the “elections” in putatively “democratic” countries around the world which are controlled by single parties and/or dictators. 

California in fact has become a single party state. Yes, yes, I’m registered as a Democrat like many of our readers, but I know that Democratic Party honchos behind the scenes are picking the winners before the election, and they don’t care who I want. Primaries are non-partisan and held at obscure times which guarantee low voter turnout. 

I’ve previously expressed my annoyance that Mark Humbert, the older White male San Francisco lawyer who’s running in District 8, where I live, already boasts the endorsement of all the big cheese Democrats who are responsible for turning Berkeley into a builder's gold mine, especially the incumbent. His glossy postcard mailer boasts a dozen or so technicolor headshots of anybody who’s anybody in the local Democratic uni-party (plus a couple of fuzzy dogs). 

His highlighted problems on this fancy card reflect his background as a homeowner in the Claremont-Elmwood neighborhood, the pricey east end of District 8: public safety, homelessness, small business. Problems all, not solutions. 

Nothing there about equity or climate or UC expansion or the Big Ugly Building Boom in market-rate dormitories or the shortage of family housing. 

Berkeley should do better. 

Now that I’ve also seen Humbert in an online forum next to one of the other candidates, I’m even more annoyed. Mari Mendonca is a Berkeley-raised grandmother, a woman of color, a renter, an articulate community housing activist and a leader in the Friends of Adeline group which is grappling with development of the Ashby Bart parking lot. Our self-styled progressives ought to be all over her. 

Watch this remarkable video that Mari made to show to Berkeley’s Housing Advisory Committee, exposing the disastrous mess that’s been made of Harriet Tubman Terrace senior housing under the ironic title of “renewal”. She's not a pro, just an active citizen with a smart phone who's trying to make things work. 

All the Planet can do to influence Berkeley's tepid city government is make sure that the key issues are aired, even though city electeds have less and less that they seem to be able to do to make things right. 

I’d like to offer the Planet’s Public Comment space for Berkeleyans for all citizens to report on what’s wrong, on the off chance that someone’s listening who can actually accomplish something to fix it if they're elected. But don’t count on it, given the current political situation. 

I was amused to see that one of the other online outlets offered candidates and their fans a total of one (1) op-ed of fewer than 600 words to support each candidate. I guess they know their readers. 

Well, here at the Planet we’ve got plenty of space and some pretty savvy readers, so as long as your op-ed submission is plain text or an attached .docx file we’ll be very happy to run it. There's no per-candidate limit. 

I personally think that readers’ eyes glaze over at about 1000 words, but that’s up to you. 

Email address: election@berkeleydailyplanet.com. Let us know what you think. 

 

 

 

 

 


Public Comment

ON MENTAL WELLNESS: Support from Family is Crucial

Jack Bragen
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:01:00 PM

In the past, some psychologists theorized that schizophrenia passes from one generation to the next because the parents are or were "schizophrenogenic." This was a way of blaming parents for the disease of their offspring. Schizophrenia is a physical disease that impacts consciousness and affects numerous other things. Calling parents schizophrenogenic is like blaming the parents when a child has cancer or arthritis. There is no difference. 

People incorrectly believe it is shameful to have a mental illness. Families at one time kept their mentally ill family member a secret. At a guess, this is the same kind of thing that may have once happened when a family member was LGBTQ. 

When I first became ill, there were very hard circumstances in my life that contributed to the first episode. This constituted an environmental factor. Psychiatrists who dealt with me were unaware of this. Yet, had circumstances been better, it would only have delayed becoming ill by maybe a year or two--it wouldn't have prevented me from getting psychotic. I have memories of paranoid thinking that date back to the mid nineteen seventies, when I was in my early teens and when life wasn't especially hard. 

My behavior in my mid to late teens made my life much harder than it had to be. I attribute these behaviors to the beginnings of becoming ill. No one taught me to behave like a jerk. 

Since the time I became ill, around 40 years ago, family members have been a huge source of support. In 1982, family didn't know what they were dealing with in me. They were probably frightened, both for my sake and theirs. My behavior was bizarre and violent. My speech wasn't making sense. I was leaving notes that didn't make any sense. I recall I'd written a note and had put it on the outside of the front door to our house--attached to the wood of the door with a sharp object. I was also jailed. Once I was released and stabilized on medication and supervision, it was probably a huge relief for family members. 

I recall my eighteenth birthday celebration took place at the dining hall at Gladman Psychiatric Hospital in Oakland. Family gave me a lot of chocolate. It was to become almost a family custom to give me chocolate when I was sick, in the repeat episodes that I experienced later--which invariably were caused by medication noncompliance. 

Family helped me get through the hardest times I've ever experienced. And when I had well times, family expressed to me how they were very proud. In my twenties I had a pretty good career repairing home electronics. I worked both for repair shops and on my own. 

The support of family in getting well should never be underestimated. The connections go beyond being sick, beyond having inexplicable behavior, and beyond apparently not amounting to as much as I'd hoped. This is not to say there were never arguments. Yet, once I got past the ordeal of that horrible first psychotic episode, I'd learned in some part of my brain how not to become violent and how to prevent being charged with a crime. 

Since the time I was in my mid-twenties, family has expected that for the most part, I should fend for myself. Beginning in 1989, no family member had space for me to continue living with them. This had nothing to do with punishment--they simply did not have space to house me. I was told I had to get a job and support myself or get on Social Security and move out either way. They believed, correctly, that I was capable of being on my own. And this is a good thing. I see it as an affirmation, a vote of confidence, and not as a rejection. Many families continue to let their mentally ill offspring live at home. This may make a bad situation worse, or it may work well for some families. 

Many families of mentally ill offspring face the dilemma of taking care of their loved one at home versus making them live elsewhere. It is a personal decision and entirely up to individual families--none of anyone else's business. Many people with mental illness just can't make it on their own. On the other hand, having a mentally ill offspring living at home well into middle age could be very uncomfortable. This is one reason there should be more resources to help adult and aging mentally ill people. 

Me and my spouse, while we have our disagreements, are here for each other. And maybe this is what family looks like in the future. Yet, no one can predict the future. 

To get tangential, living forty years with schizophrenia and functioning as well as I do is an accomplishment. Many people may doubt that I was mentally ill in the first place. This is because my most recent fully blown psychotic episode was in 1996, and it was due to noncompliance. Even then, family helped, as did the person I would later marry. 

Family helps provide a reason to keep going. If I didn't have family, not just to bring me into the world, but to help, I wouldn't be here. 


Jack Bragen is a writer who lives in Martinez, California.


A BERKELEY ACTIVIST'S DIARY, Week Ending September 24

Kelly Hammargren
Tuesday September 27, 2022 - 01:38:00 PM

Between my former lives as a plein air painter and a home health nurse in the inner city of Los Angeles, I am geared to taking in as much of my surroundings as possible. Last week I wrote about asphalt in tree wells in front of BODYROX. It is always a benefit to pay attention and this time it was a benefit to be wrong as that lead to an extended email exchange with Scott Ferris, Director of Recreation, Parks and Waterfront. It turns out the product around the trees only looks like asphalt and is instead a product that is flexible and porous protecting tree roots and letting water run through. 

Ferris didn’t say which of the two manufacturers Rubberway https://sustainablesurfacing.com/pervious-pavement or Flexi-pave https://apaicorp.com/kbi.htm Berkeley is using, but the product used at 3120 Eton in 2017 to save a majestic Redwood from having its roots cut to replace damaged concrete is a much closer blend in color to a concrete sidewalk (see photo in google maps https://goo.gl/maps/H9G3E1zg6J7iDt7VA). It has a nice cushy feel when walking on it.  

I’ve already emailed all the information Ferris sent to me to the Zoning Adjustment Board (ZAB) and the Design Review Committee (DRC). Charles Kahn, architect, on ZAB and DRC emailed he is sharing the information with his group. These products have a lot of potential. According to the websites there’s a long list of benefits over asphalt. The most pressing need is to reduce runoff so that when we do get rain it soaks into the ground. Rubberway and Flexi-Pav do just that, let the rain water soak through and filter it too. But they are not just a permeable surface for sidewalks, paths, parking lots and roadways, they are durable, non-toxic, divert tires from landfill and more. Seattle and Washington DC are two cities Ferris named that are using these products. 

We still need to change our thinking about trees so that what we plant will support local ecosystems and provide the shade we need from large canopies to reduce the heat island effect. 

The Community for a Cultural Civic Center (CCCC) met twice during the week. Councilmember Hahn attended the Monday noon meeting to pump votes and volunteers for yes on Measure L. According to the Yes on L card dropped on my doorstep, Hahn donated $5,000.00 to the Yes on L campaign as did Gordon Wozniak. Jesse Arreguin and Raymond Yep each donated $1,000.00. John Caner emphasized that community members of CCCC represent a variety of opinions. I stand in strong opposition to Measure L. 

At the meeting on Wednesday Susi Marzuola from Siegel & Strain gave a presentation from current meetings the consultants from Siegel & Strain have been having with the City. The presentation will be given at a “multi-commission” (Civic Arts, Landmarks and Public Works, now combined with Transportation) meeting at 11 am on Thursday, September 29--a meeting that has yet to appear on the City website. The zoom link sent by CCCC for that 11 am meeting is https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81499570453?pwd=Qk9tU3BFbml2bFg0TWlmVGVTeHJGZz09.  

Marzuola talked through a long list of slides and presented two considerations for construction of a new 270 seat new city council chamber at either behind the Maudelle Shirek Building (old city hall) or in the Civic Center Park at the location of the parking lot connected to 2180 Milvia. CCCC strongly opposed building new city council chambers in the Civic Center Park months ago. 

The external seismic buttressing to the Veterans’ Building, which would have added 8000 square feet of usable “back stage” space, making the Veterans Building incredibly versatile as a performance center, was also rejected, in favor of instead upgrading the Maudelle Shirek building to the seismic standard of IO, Immediate Occupancy, the standard used for hospitals and like buildings. The CCCC recommended seismic bracing to just below IO to BPON+ a standard at lower cost which would leave the Maudelle Shirek and Veterans’ buildings standing and repairable.  

New Council Chambers for 270 is an interesting number. Prior to the pandemic the city council was meeting at 1231 Addison Street in the Berkeley Unified School District Board Room, which was remodeled to be used jointly by BUSD and City Council. It has seating for 240 members of the public. Most city council meetings have had well under 100 attendees, frequently even fewer than 50. When there are contentious items on the agenda, as there was at least once during the pandemic, attendance on Zoom swelled to more than 350. 

The pandemic and Zoom have really changed how we attend meetings. It is nice to see people in public, meet new people, reconnect, but the convenience of being able to walk over to a computer or carry a device around at home to watch a meeting instead of being trapped in a room all evening for one or two agenda items is the answer many want. Certainly, parents with young kids or really anyone with caregiving responsibilities appreciate being able to tune in for the agenda items that matter to them and still put their kids to bed on time on school nights and not have to pay for a babysitter. 

Attending The Color of Water: A Policy Discussion, a meeting hosted by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, was a reminder of why I prefer Zoom. I spent 55 minutes in transit (driving and parking) for a four-hour meeting that had almost no new information that could have just as easily with less environmental impact been provided 100% via zoom. Just the plastic bags, throw away cups and plates should make anyone cringe with the waste of it all. And, though city council meetings do not provide food or beverages for the public, long meetings do provide meals for council and staff and the rest of us need to bring rations to make it through the usual long evenings. 

It looks like the Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Measure L got it right, “Future Councils will have the freedom to spend much of this money on vanity projects like new Council chambers as has been proposed!” Vincent Casalaina, who opposes Measure L described it this way, “This is money looking for projects, not projects looking for money.” 

Every voter should read the East Bay Times editorial from September 3, 2022 regarding Oakland’s Measure U as it could just as easily have been written about Berkeley’s Measure L. 

The paragraph that says it all states, “The issue is not whether the city needs more money to fix its badly dilapidated roads. It does. The issue is that, when city leaders ask for new taxes, they need to come with clear budgets that ensure the money will be wisely spent — and data that demonstrate past tax revenues have been used efficiently.” https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/09/03/editorial-oakland-voters-should-reject-850-million-measure-u-bond/ 

It should come as no surprise there is a long list of elected officials endorsing Measure L, as what elected official doesn’t love money coming with an open-ended list of ideas for spending. 

Deb Durant said on Wednesday that there are huge developments on the Turtle Island Monument/Fountain planning. The whole thing may be considerably delayed. She will share next time. Previous coverage of the Turtle Island Monument in the Activist Diary covered reporting that the project consultants did not want to hear from the Ohlone/Lisjuan People the Monument is supposed to honor. 

Erin Diehm mentioned daylighting the creek in the Civic Center Park and that arrangements are still being made to schedule a presentation by Ann Riley. Marzuola was quick to brush this aside. Greening cities is a big movement, and per Diehm’s research with Riley there is a lot of grant money available for projects. Watch for announcement of a future meeting on daylighting. After I spent a morning in Strawberry Park when the park was packed, daylighting the creek sounds incredibly exciting. 

This is a week when I feel like why can’t our information devices work like a toaster: Put in the bread, turn it on, and toast. For us older folks, we remember when appliances just worked by turning them on, and when they broke, they went to the repair person for a new cord or new switch or some other little part and lasted for many more years. This week I am hearing about emails and messages getting lost, texts requiring new programs, computers breaking down. It is all at a time with the days to the November election are flying away and there are never enough waking hours to fit everything in. 

At least Tuesday’s City Council meeting ended at around 8:09 pm. 

Council moved everything to Consent except technical edits and corrections to the Zoning code. Item 16 under Action, restoring and improving access to the City of Berkeley website https://berkeleyca.gov/ , was moved to Consent, cutting off discussion of the mess that has been created for those of us who search history for past city actions. I put a specific resolution number into Records Online and got back pages and pages of documents to sift through (I stopped counting after 200) none of which had the document. I tried using the search option in the new City website which in turn spit out a list of unwanted documents, everything except what I requested. 

Item 17. for extending existing contracts for services for the poor for another year instead of requesting new proposals with new cost estimates, went to Consent without even one word of discussion. 

Even the City Auditor was relegated to Public Comment on the clock instead of giving the Audit Status Report presentation. 

So while ending early is nice, cutting off needed discussion and debate, especially discussion that points out problems for which the City Manager bears responsibility, should leave us to question just exactly why such problems are getting a pass instead of transparency. 

The 4:00 pm City Council meeting on housing was a work session with no vote taken. The council received a report on adding “middle’ housing, which is now duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, these smaller buildings in previous single-family home neighborhoods and recommendations for increasing density in the Southside area for students. The hillside fire zones are exempted from adding density with these smaller multi-unit projects. Evacuating households in the fire zone areas are already a known problem. 

Councilmember Harrison asked that housing plans include places for grocery stores instead of just more coffee shops and reminded all that the least expensive units are in the buildings we already have (older buildings). Councilmember Hahn focused on the idea that in adding all this lot coverage we need to be looking at green accessible space on the ground open to the public, not just street trees or green roofs that are not accessible at all. There needs to be accessible open green space. Both Hahn and Harrison noted the advantage of creating units inside existing buildings especially older large single-family homes. 

The last project reviewed at the Zoning Adjustment Board (ZAB) was 2065 Kittredge. which will demolish the Shattuck Cinemas and most of the former Hinks Building.. When an attendee John D. (I didn’t get his last name) who identified himself as being from the building industry raised his hand, I expected a long dissertation on praises for the building. Instead it was a criticism that the developer is not using union labor and workers did not receive health benefits. Bill Shrader, the developer for this building and several others downtown, said he builds with an open shop and 40% to 60% are union labor. 

Charles Kahn, architect and ZAB member responded that ZAB did not have the authority to require union labor and stated, “I would be ashamed to be a developer that health insurance is not provided.” The project was passed out of ZAB to return to the Design Review Committee to reconsider the color palette, removing the west facing wall section that is black, among other things. 

In closing I wish to thank Michelle LePaule for the book recommendation for The Privatization of Everthing by Donald Cohen and Alan Mikaelian. This book is fabulous and I will never look at privatization or public private partnerships the same way again. It is a solid reminder of all the great important services provided by government especially in the areas of research, weather, public libraries, education, water, and that is just for starters. The authors lay out how privatization and the declarations of efficiency are really taking out the “service” and putting in “profit” and how the “profit” steadily drains away the service harming us all. 

The authors call the promise of privatization as being less costly and more efficient a false myth, and go through example after example.  

Cohen and Mikaelian go into detail about how privatization actually hinders innovation. Innovation means taking risks that may not pan out. Innovation grows from sharing ideas, successes and failures. In privately held companies; when sharing means that some other company, a competitor, might make the discovery or find the solution, then the privatized entity is going to keep innovations proprietary, even going so far as to require employees to sign non-disclosure contracts. This even extends to examples of charter schools prohibiting teachers from sharing successful lessons. 

There is a lot covered in The Privatization of Everything. It is definitely worth your time and the wait at the library. The library could use a couple of more copies. 


THE PUBLIC EYE: Ukraine: What Happens Next?

Bob Burnett
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:27:00 PM

It's been seven months since Russia invaded Ukraine (February 24). It's turned into a remake of David vs. Goliath.

1.Russia is losing the war: At the beginning of the invasion, most observers believed that Russia would overwhelm Ukraine. That didn't happen. After months of conflict, the war reached a tipping point with the Ukrainian liberation of Kharkiv Oblast (province). Now it appears to be only a matter of time until Ukraine pushes out all the Russian invaders.

There are multiple reasons why Russia is losing. The first is that the Ukrainians have out-fought the Russians; the Ukrainian soldiers are highly motivated and the Russians are not. The second reason is that the Russia military has been "hollowed out" because Russia is a kleptocracy and Putin and his cronies have siphoned funds, that should have gone to defense, for their own purposes. In all facets of the Russian invasion we see indications that the invasion was underfunded, and terribly managed. 

Russian soldiers are poorly trained. There is inadequate communication between front-line troops and battlefield commanders. The Russian generals have made many bad tactical decisions; for example to invade the Donbas region in the spring while the ground was very wet. The Russian supply infrastructure is woefully inadequate. Russians seemingly have no capability of repairing vehicles that break down in the field. Because of the EU sanctions, Russia cannot obtain critical parts it needs to repair or replace its equipment. (While Russia has shown the capability to build prototypes of advanced weapons, they cannot manufacture them.) Ukraine used NATO High-Mobility Artillery Rocket systems (HIMARS) to destroy Russian arms depots and supply lines. In many parts of occupied Ukraine, Russian troops are running low on food, gasoline, and weapons. 

The Russian military is a mess. Russian military power was over-rated. 

2. Russia is headed for a major defeat. The war is being fought in four eastern Ukrainian oblasts: Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk -- from south to north. (Ukraine recently liberated the Kharkiv Oblast -- adjacent to Donetsk and Luhansk.) 

Russia was duped into massing troops in Kherson Oblast, particularly around the capitol city of Kherson. Instead of attacking Kherson, Ukrainian forces moved rapidly into the eastern sector of Kharkiv Oblast and recaptured it. Now they've moved into Donetsk Oblast and liberated the city of Lyman. Meanwhile in the south, Ukrainian forces have advanced to the key city of Kherson and seem close to trapping thousands of Russian troops in the section of Kherson Oblast that is west of Dnipro river. (These troops are perilously short of food, gasoline, and ammunition.) 

When Kherson Oblast falls, Russian forces will be forced to retreat into Crimea -- historically part of Ukraine, but occupied by Russia since 2014. 

3. Putin is not ready to accept a loss. Even as it appears obvious that Russia has lost its war in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin remains intransigent. His desperation has driven him to three ill-considered actions: 

First, Putin announced the annexation of parts of eastern Ukraine: aspects of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk Oblasts (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/23/russia-referendum-occupied-ukraine-annexation/? ) to declare this Ukrainian territory as part of Russia. Thereafter, we will claim that any Ukrainian attacks in the region are an attack on Russia itself. He's intentionally expanding the scope of the war. 

Second, Putin declared an additional mobilization of Russian forces. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/21/putin-speech-annexation-ukraine-russia/?) He called up 300,000 reserves to join the forces already in Ukraine. (Russia has about 2 million reserves.) 

Third, Putin issued new nuclear threats. (In a televised address, Putin said, "I'm not bluffing," about the possible use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine.) Russian forces control the Ukrainian nuclear facility at Zaporizhzhia; it's the largest nuclear power plant in Europe and the 10th largest in the world. Putin will use this facility as a threat and (possibly) bring tactical nuclear weapons into the newly "annexed" areas of Ukraine. 

Adding 300,000 reserves will not help the Russian effort in Ukraine. The Russian problem is not manpower; their problem is mismanagement of the war effort. That's a problem that goes all the way up the chain of command and ends with Putin. Putin is a terrible manager and, therefore, a loser. 

At some point, Ukrainian forces will push far enough into Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk Oblasts that Putin will be tempted to use tactical nuclear weapons -- perhaps this will be precipitated by the fall of the city of Kherson. 

4. Russians have committed atrocities. It's one thing to be incompetent and quite another thing to be a brutal loser. Russia's conduct of the war has outraged the western world. Russian troops appear to have no respect for civilized norms. Most recently we learned of a massacre at Ilium in the Kharkiv Oblast. (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/16/ukraine-mass-grave-with-440-bodies-discovered-in-recaptured-izium-says-police-chief

5. Putin is murdering his opponents. For months we have been reading stories about the "mysterious" deaths of high-level Russians who have dared to criticize Vladimir Putin. (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/08/26/dan-rapoport-putin-critic-was-it-suicide-00053836) Typically, they fall from tall buildings. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/9/21/2124313/-Another-Russian-dies-from-Tall-Building-Syndrome?

Putin is taking extreme action to silence Russians who disagree with him. 

5. Winter is coming. This isn't a war that will be ended with a peace conference where dignitaries sign agreements. This is an ugly conflict that threatens to get even uglier. 

In the next three months, it's likely that Ukrainian forces will retake most of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk. (Unless, of course, the unthinkable happens and Putin uses nuclear weapons.) By December, the Ukrainian HIMARS will be able to reach all of Crimea, and possibly the Russian Navy which has been hiding in the Black Sea on the south side of the Crimean peninsula. 

In response, Russia will cut off all fossil fuel deliveries to the EU. There will be severe economic consequences. 

6. China as peacemaker. In his prescient dystopian novel, 1984, George Orwell imagined the planet being governed by three totalitarian states: Oceania (the Americas, Australia, and South Africa), Eurasia (the EU and Russia), and Eastasia (China). There were shifting alliances between the three powers. 

With regard to the Ukraine-Russia conflict, there are four geo-political stances: NATO (North America and the EU), Russia, China, and neutral states, such as Brazil. If Russia/Putin threatens the use of tactical nuclear weapons, it's reasonable to expect NATO to form an alliance to stop this. The question is what will China do? 

China is helping fund Putin's war by buying fossil fuel from Russia. China can stop Putin from using tactical nuclear weapons by threatening reprisals. Will Chairman Xi do this? 

Hold on tight. 

 


 

Bob Burnett is a Bay Area writer and activist. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net 


Yes or No on Berkeley's $650 Million Measure L on November 8?

Kelly Hammargren
Monday September 26, 2022 - 02:45:00 PM

When our ballots arrive, we will be deciding whether to vote no or yes on Measure L the Berkeley $650,000,000 General Obligation Bonds. The total cost according to the City’s “best estimate” is $1,125,000,000. The City estimates property owners will pay $475,000,000 in interest and service fees making the final cost for the Measure L Bonds to be paid out over 48 years to be over $1.1 billion.

The ballot statement is:

Shall the measure to create affordable housing; repair streets and sidewalks; underground utilities; and enhance buildings, infrastructure, and safety, authorizing the issuance of $650,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to independent oversight and audits, be adopted?

In making your decision of whether to vote for or against the bonds, skip over the promises made in the Yes on L card dropped on your doorstep and the promises made in https://www.renewberkeley.org/ and go to the bond measure text and note these points:

  • “dollar amounts are estimates and are not a commitment or guarantee that any specific amounts will be spent on particular projects or categories of projects.“
  • “The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the City based on need for funds and other factors”
These two statements open the use of bonds funds to anything that can loosely fit the laundry list of possible spending ideas or categories of projects. There are no specific projects, there is no priority of spending. It is not even known who will be making the decisions on what, or how money generated from the Bonds will be spent, with the decision to sell bonds based on the “need for funds and other factors.” .

If each bond is paid off over 30 years, then selling the bonds can be spread over up to 18 years, but even that is unknown, because it was a citizen who found calculation errors in the proposed ballot measure financial statements and challenged council that the estimate of cost to the property owners may have been off by as much as 50% (Reported in the August 7, 2022 Activist’s Diary). This resulted in last minute changes to the financial projections and spreading repayment over 48 years.

It is the statement of “no commitment or guarantee” that is the focus of the opposition to Measure L https://berkeleyansforbetterplanning.org/why-no/ , in addition to barriers to providing oversight for existing ballot measures and the absence of clear accounting for current ballot measures. 

More important, how is the City of Berkeley performing with regards to accepting oversight for current Ballot Measures? 

Look no further than the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission, tasked with oversight of Measures FF (2020) and GG (2008). 

At the June 28 2022 City Council meeting, the evening Council approved the biennial budget for fiscal years 2023 and 2024 (7/1/2022 – 6/30/2024), the request for financial reports which had been made by the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission at their February 23 2022 meeting finally reached the agenda as item 48 a. 

It took four months for the formal request from the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission for quarterly and timely expenditure reports to reach council. 

This request was supposed to enable the Commission to perform the Commission’s oversight function and to perform that function in advance of the Council vote on the 2023 and 2024 budget. 

According to Council agenda rules, the City Manager has 90 days to respond to any submission from a commission. The response appears as a “Companion Report” usually listed as item b. 

The request from the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission for timely information to fulfill their oversight responsibilities did not even merit a discussion from the City Council. Agenda item 48 a. & b. were moved by the mayor from “action” to “consent” and that was the end of it for the council, but not the end of it for the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission. 

The Companion Report response to the request from the Commission for financial information to provide oversight contained these statements in 48.b. “The Fire Department staff has committed to providing the DFSC [Disaster and Fire Safety Commission] line item budgets on Measures GG and FF funding plans prior to the budget process cycle as much as feasible.” [emphasis added] And continued, “Budget authority rests with the City Manager” and, “If there are areas that the Commission disagrees with Staff plan’s [for expenditures], they [commission] can make recommendations to Council via Memo or Report to Council.” 

The Commission is dependent on the Fire Department to provide the financial information for oversight.  

The June 28 2022 companion report cites that the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission received a staff budget presentation on Measure FF on January 27, 2021. According to the Companion report, the Fire Department will provide biennial reports, which leaves the Disaster and Fire Safety Commission tasked with oversight of Measure FF waiting until January 2023 for the next budget/financial report on Measure FF. The same companion report states, “reporting request for Measure GG takes more time.” 

Two years is a long time to wait for information for the opportunity to provide ”insights or thoughts” on how the Fire Department spent the Measure FF funds. And when the commission makes a request or sends a Memo or Report, four months is a long time for the Memo Report to reach City Council. 

At the June 22, 2022 the Homeless Panel of Experts with oversight responsibility for Measure P voted to submit this letter to council: 

“We object to the use of Measure P funds in order to balance the city budget. Measure P was originally passed not as a budget balancing provision but, importantly, as a new funding source specifically to fund new programs addressing the needs of people experiencing housing insecurity and homelessness. Frankly, we are appalled that the City of Berkeley has decided to use $2.7 million of Measure P funds to pay for programs already in existence – in most cases for many years. This flies in the face of the original intent of Measure P. It is deeply disappointing, given how desperately extra funds are needed, and will be needed, to address the city’s housing crisis and need for more homeless support services. While we support these existing homeless programs individually, and many of these programs provide great services, we feel their funding must continue to come from their original funding source.” 

Whatever scrambling occurs between now and the November 8 election day in an attempt to shore up Measure L , the $650,000,000 General Obligation Bonds with no guarantee or commitment, this Council, this mayor, this city manager have revealed their definition of oversight through their response to commissions. 

Oversight in this setting is just an empty word and does not fit this definition: 

“Oversight of a system or process is the responsibility for making sure that it works efficiently and correctly.” 

There is another definition of oversight and Berkeley’s actions do not fit that either:“Oversight is an unintentional, careless mistake or omission, something that is missed.” 

It is intentional. 

Commissions provide advice and nothing more: advice that is accepted or dismissed. And the financial reports on which that advice is based so that sound assessment can be made will be provided when “feasible.” 

This analysis did not review how often or for how many weeks and months current reporting requirements were missed. That is an insurmountable task with the replacement of the City’s website. 

The mayor and council members have discussed that Berkeley residents are under bonded, that Berkeley tax payers have room for a big bond ballot initiative. 

Here are ballot measures that Berkeley voters have already passed with the year they were passed: 

Measure U1 (2016) permanently increases gross receipts tax on owners of five or more rental units from 1.081% to 2.880% to fund programs to increase affordable housing and protect residents from homelessness. (exemptions: new buildings for 12 years, rent-controlled, section 8 and affordable housing non-profits) 

Measure FF (2020) permanent property tax until repealed which may be increased every year with cost of living or per capita income growth whichever is greater, for firefighting, emergency medical response, hazard mitigation, wildfire prevention and preparedness. 

Measure GG (2008) permanent special split rate tax for fire protection and emergency response and preparedness imposed on all improvements (all buildings). Dwellings are taxed at a lower square foot rate than other buildings and both tax rates may be increased every year with cost of living or per capita income growth whichever is greater. 

Measure GG (2020) tax on riders using transportation network companies (rideshare) originating in Berkeley starting rate of 50 cents for private trip or 25 cents per person for pooled riders. Rate may be increased each year with cost of living or per capita income growth whichever is greater. Tax ends 1/1/2041. General tax for unrestricted general revenue purposes. 

Measure M (2012) $30,000,000 general obligation bonds for street and watershed improvements and integrated Green Infrastructure. 

Measure O (2018) $135,000,000 bonds to fund housing for low, very low, median and middle-income household to be repaid over 36 years estimated cost. Oversight Housing Advisory Commission and City Council https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/our-work/bond-revenue-measures/measure-o 

Measure P (2018) increases the transfer tax on property sales of properties over $1,500,000 from 1.5% to 2.5% for 10 years expiring 12/31/2028 to raise funds for general municipal purposes such as mental health support, rehousing and other services for the homeless. Includes staffing costs associated with implementing programs. Oversight Homeless Panel of Experts 

Measure T1 (2016) $100,000,000 general obligation bonds over a 40 year period to repair, renovate, replace or reconstruct the City’s aging infrastructure and facilities including sidewalks, storm drains, parks, streets, senior and recreation centers and other City facilities and buildings. 

The November 8 2022 Vacancy Tax ballot measure is also named Measure M. When ballot measures use the same letters from a previous measure in another year it can be confusing. The Vacancy Tax Measure M (2022) taxes property owners with rentals vacant for greater than 182 days. The tax is in effect from 1/1/2024 through 12/31/2034. Owners of apartments with four or fewer units who live on their property and do not own any other homes will be exempt. The Empty Homes Tax will be deposited into the Housing Trust Fund or may be used to fund any general municipal services designated by the Council. 

After reviewing this record, I plan to vote no on Measure L. 

 


SMITHEREENS: Reflections on Bits & Pieces: SmitherDips&Doodles

Gar Smith
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:40:00 PM

Putting Words to a Quake

On September 13, twin jolts rocked the ground in Santa Rosa. A 4.4 magnitude quake and 4.3 aftershock had been triggered by a tectonic twitch that occurred 3.5 miles below a section of the Hidden Valley neighborhood. The temblor reportedly "knocked picture frames off walls, cracked water pipes and rattled nerves."

The best description was provided to the Chronicle, as follows:
"15-year-old Charlie Scoby was watching 'Rick and Morty' on TV when the whole house shook 'like it grew legs and started to walk.'" 

Artists, Meet-ups, and Weed Wine 

On September 23, ActivSpace (the block-long West Berkeley building where I have an office) hosted an "Open Studio" so tenants could meet their neighbors and show off their wares. 

Office Manager Chandra Thomas presided over the event from a ground-floor studio bedecked with posters and balloons. Inside, a gallery of small oil paintings were on display. The paintings were signed by artists representing themselves as "Bart Simpson" and "Laffy Taffy" and they bore truly unbelievable prices that included "$5," "25 cents," and "for a nice smile." 

Management had prepared a bountiful table of snacks, along with several bins of iced sodas, and a selection of wines. 

The label on a bottle of Weed Cabernet Sauvignon caught my eye. It promised "a luscious palate of cherry, blackcurrant, and savory black plum [that] sing harmoniously with velvety vanilla." But given the recent wildfires that have scorched northern California (and laid waste to the town of Weed), the part of the label that stuck in my mind was the line that promised: "aromas of coffee, clove and charred wood." 

Karmic Strips 

Like Charles Schultz' Peanuts, Garry Trudeau's daily Doonesbury strips have been in re-runs for years. This allows the artist to spend more time creating new and timely strips for the Sunday Comics. 

But the daily time-warp hit an unexpected speed-bump on September 12 when a strip that originally ran in 1997 showed a character named Joanie Caucus returning to Berkeley for a reunion at Boalt Law School (now UC Berkeley School of Law). 

Joanie's friend Ginny laments "the end of affirmative action" at UCB. "The incoming class has only one black student out of 14 admitted," she groans. "The year before, Boalt admitted 75 blacks! Great message, huh?" 

Metaverse-Adverse 

The cover of a recent issue of TIME Magazine was devoted to an exploration "The Metaverse" (aka Marc Zuckerberg's secret fantasy hideaway). The accompanying essay concluded with the following sentence: "The idea of the metaverse means an ever-growing share of our lives, labor, leisure, time, wealth, happiness, and relationships will be spent inside virtual worlds, rather than just aided through digital devices." 

Somehow, the idea that our collapsing planet can be saved if only more people spent time at home with their heads stuck inside brain-entraining VR buckets doesn't convince or comfort me. My response to the Metaverse boils down to the first key syllable of the loathsome word itself: "Meh." 

Fashion Plates 

A dark Honda with a New Jersey plate reading: K11 GRK (Judging from the nearby Hawks sticker and the declaration "Spartan Pride," I'm guessing this is a Spartan sport fan's competitive vow to devastate the Spartans' major opponent. Hence: "Kill Greek") 

A little blue VW: FIZZ (A cute match) 

A black Chevy sportscar: HRDCGAM (I'm at a loss here. Any ideas? "Hard to See a Leg"?) 

How Earth Island Almost Had a Floating Office 

On September 21, the Chronicle ran an article headlined: "A 1925 ferry returns to S.F. with a big rooftop garden." It was about the nostalgic homecoming of The Klamath, a Bay Area treasure, to its old home in the waters off San Francisco. John King's Chronicle article was filled to the gills with tangy historical details but it didn't cover the Klamath's near-moment as a floating office for environmental Archdruid David Brower's newly launched activist organization, Earth Island Institute (now celebrating its 40th anniversary in the eco-friendly David Brower Building at 2150 Allston Way In downtown Berkeley). 

As a member of the radical Friends of the Earth contingent that became the activist-based Earth Island Institute, I was pleased to receive the following email recollections from John Knox, Executive Director Emeritus of Earth Island Institute. 

That mention of The Klamath jogged some memory marbles but I couldn't quite reassemble the events that nearly gave our feisty crew of eco-activists our very own armada. 

I wrote to John, thanking him for stepping to the podium with an email version of a tidy TED Talk. In my note, I mentioned: "It's rare good news that such a storied ship gets reborn (reberthed?) in home waters, so this is a cause for gratitude." With The Klamath's return to the Embarcadero, I suggested, we might want to host "a future celebration of Earth Island onboard the boat. We could gather at the stern for a group photo. It would be a ferry-tale ending." 

(Here's John Knox's memoire, reposted with permission.) 

Dear Islanders of Various Vintages, 

It's been a while since the early days of Earth Island back in the 1980s, so I'm not sure how many of you might know about a unique and challenging opportunity that came up for Earth Island in 1990 or so. Walter Landor had sold his famous design firm Landor and Associates to Young & Rubicam, and his family was left with the equally notable ferry, The Klamath, which had been Landor's corporate headquarters (and party venue) but which was left out of the sale. (Here's a little about Walter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Landor.)  

The Klamath was in the stripped and skeletal condition of an elderly ship waiting for its next life. It sat in its historic berth at Pier 3-1/2, not far from our 300 Broadway offices. 

I don't recall clearly how we got the very flattering offer from the Landors — among other facts, the Landors knew about the Browers, and vice versa, and I knew Walter slightly — but I became the primary party to represent Earth Island in considering their proposed gift of The Klamath for Earth Island's use. 

There was a lunch between Dave and Anne Brower and Walter and Josephine Landor at Green's, all very cordial and positive. But the formidable work that it would take to make the boat worthy for habitation turned out to be too much for young Earth Island to undertake, and eventually the boat was sold to Duraflame and moved to Stockton. Walter and Josephine came to Dave's 80th birthday party at Green's in 1992, not long before his death. 

I sought out The Klamath in Stockton a few years ago, and it had devolved into being an isolated (fenced off) conference and party venue. 

As the Chronicle article details, The Klamath is back with a bright new life on the Embarcadero, now at Pier 9. The Bay Area Council, a think tank with strong business ties, took on the challenge of bringing it back. I definitely want to go for a look, in part to revisit the fantasies of a floating home for a very young group called Earth Island. 

Biden’s Hypocritical Take on 'Taking Countries by Force

In a recent appearance before the United Nations General Assembly in New York, President Joe Biden condemned Russian Leader Vladimir Putin for his invasion of Ukraine. Biden barked that it is understood by all civilized nations that you "can't take a country's territory by force." 

In making this statement, Biden must have left many members of the UNGA shaking their heads and whispering the word "hypocrisy!" 

As Dr. Gideon Polya pointed out in a Countercurrents article (recently reposted on my website, Environmentalists Against War), Biden chose to ignore Washington's own history. As the headline on Polya's long and extensive history of America's foreign aggressions put it: 

The US Has Invaded 70 Nations Since 1776
– Including 50 Nations Since 1945
 

From the end of the Korean conflict in 1950 to a spate of military attacks on Libya and Syria in 2015, the Pentagon dropped bombs on more than 30 foreign nations representing one-third of the planet's human population. Among the countries bombed: Afghanistan, China, Congo, Grenada, Guatemala, El Salvador, Kuwait, Lebanon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Panama, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Yugoslavia. 

The US Empire was built and expanded by "taking countries by force." In addition to seizing native lands, the US seized Western lands from Mexico, seized the islands of Puerto Rico and Hawai'i, and continues to control a seized portion of Cuba known as Guantanamo. 

The Hot Tub Guy 

The SF Chronicle noted Deward Hasting's passing with this description: "For almost 50 years, he was known as the 'hot tub guy,' a former hippie in Berkeley who ran a semi-secret hot tub in his backyard that tens of thousands of locals — and travelers — were free to dip into, if they knew where to look, or had the code." Back in the mid-1960s, Deward "was a press operator, putting ink on paper — first for UC Berkeley's Free Speech Movement and later as Berkeley Free Press." 

The East Bay Times saluted Deward in a recent article titled: "‘Bastion of Weirdos’: Berkeley mourns Hot Tub Guy after nearly 50 years of free soaks." 

I got to know about "the tub guy" when I was working at the Berkeley Barb. Several Barbistas had access to the secret code that controlled the locked gate that granted access to the tub in the backyard of the home on Essex Street. 

I never met Deward but I enjoyed lots of soaks in the hot tube (one of the hottest I've ever stewed in, it was set at 113.5 F). There was only one rule at the tub, and it was an odd one: Whether others were already in the tub and/or others arrived during your soak: "No conversation, please." 

I recall a nice bonus. After leaving the tub, we were free to silently run around beneath the huge redwood trees in the backyard — in the buff. 

Deward was also an activist whose support for the Free Speech Movement triggered some recollections among members of the FSM Archives (www.fsm-a.org). 

FSM vet (and author) Barbara Garson writes:
"When the FSM was still back in the age of mimeography, Deward Hastings helped excavate and repair a photo-offset press. Working on it for days without a break, Deward had it ready for the first issue of the FSM newsletter. 

"When I expressed concern about his hours without sleep and rapid movements someone explained that Deward was a 'speed-freak.' I couldn't tell then nor do I know now if that were true.
"At the Berkeley Free Press, the machine he restored went on to turn out hundreds of thousands of beautifully printed leaflets for left groups in the Bay Area. Deward was there before there was any press in the Berkeley Free Press." 

Another FSM vet recalled:
"Good Lord, don't you remember Deward? Skinny, self-important but very quiet redhead? He tried to replace FSM Central with a place called 'Nexus' and route all FSM communication there, for whatever obscure political reasons, or maybe just social ones. Kind of a technocrat. 'Nexus' lasted about half a week, if I remember." 

And one last recollection:
"What I mainly remember about him was that he wanted to store 'acid'-laced sugar cubes in the FSM Central refrigerator and I wouldn't allow it. He claimed they weren't illegal, and I told him that I didn't want ANY reason for the police to invade." 

Deward's demise was poetic. He passed away while soaking in the tube that had provided a blessed retreat for generations of neighbors, travelers, and strangers. 

Only Love Matters: Vicki Elson 

 


Queen Elizabeth II

Jagjit Singh
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:18:00 PM

Queen Elizabeth was the enigmatic queen and embodied the myth of the good monarch. She never voiced her opinions in public, never expressed joy or sorrow. She always rose to the occasion swept up in the royal pageantry energized by the roaring crowds. She assumed her role of head of her government. All public events were meticulously choreographed by a battalion of advisers who groomed her for new role after she became head of state following the sudden death of her father, King George VI. She had been born into incredible wealth and privilege and had been schooled with private tutors. 

She held weekly meetings with her prime minister who advised her on government policies. According to the “Paradise Papers” leaked to the German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeit , the Queen avoided high UK taxes by depositing much of her wealth in offshore tax havens. 

Under her watch she dutifully acquiesced to all major government actions including repressive colonial policies which denied basic human rights to her subjects. While the Queen was enjoying all the creature comforts and adoration, her government was on a rampage using brutal force to cling onto the last vestiges of wealth and power. 

Some argue that she was a prisoner of circumstance and was following the traditional duties and values that had been established for members of the Royal Family for centuries. Her supporters argue that the queen should be celebrated for her unwavering and steadfast "service" to her country. But what does that mean? Wearing colorful hats and dresses, smiling to crowds and accepting bouquets of flowers does not remove the stench of rampant colonialism. Not all her former subjects expressed sorrow at her passing. 

Examples: 

Shortly before the Queen’s death, Uju Anya, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, called the monarch “the chief monarch of a thieving, raping, genocidal empire” on Twitter and wished her an “excruciating” death. “Give us our diamonds back and I’ll pretend to be sad!” wrote Scaachi Koul, a culture writer for Buzzfeed. Social media users of Indian origin were also sentimental about the Kohinoor diamond, set in a crown that Queen Elizabeth II would often wear. Queen Consort Camilla, the wife of King Charles III, Elizabeth’s son, is now expected to wear the diamond. Outrageous! thundered among many of the Queen’s detractors. 

The Bengal famine of 1943. An estimated 2.1 to 3.8 million Bengalis perished, from starvation, malaria and other diseases. 

“Did she not understand the trauma we experienced because of colonialism?” says Nandita Godbole, author of the forthcoming cookbook, Masaleydaar. 

During her seven decades of reign, Elizabeth visited India thrice and Pakistan and Bangladesh twice. In her last visit to India in 1997, she acknowledged the “difficult episodes” in the past and cited the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre as an example. She also visited Jallianwala Bagh and placed a wreath at the memorial. 

However, her move at Jallianwala Bagh was criticized by several scholars, including Indian politician Shashi Tharoor. “We do know that much of colonialism’s horrors over the centuries were perpetrated in the name of the Royal Family. But when she and her consort visited Jallianwala Bagh, she could only bring herself to leave her name in the visitors’ book, without even an expression of regret, let alone of contrition or apology, for that vile British act of deliberate mass murder,” Tharoor said in a debate at Oxford University. 

The Queen’s visit to Pakistan in 1997 fueled more outrage. In her official speech in Pakistan, she told India and Pakistan to “stop squabbling” and end their historic disagreements” which was especially jarring given Britain’s deliberate role in fomenting religious tensions. 

Elizabeth inherited decades of abuse and a history of colonialism, and instead of discarding that legacy, she embraced it, through the Commonwealth of Nations, which replaced British colonialism with “soft power.” This allowed Britain to maintain a chokehold on poorer nations and British expats in New Zealand, Canada and Australia. 

In 2018, British politician Jeremy Corbyn had suggested rotating the leadership of the Commonwealth among all the countries, but the Queen’s “sincere wish” was to have her son, King Charles III succeed her. Really? Don’t the British have any shame? 

As head of the Commonwealth, Britain continues to have delusions of grandeur even while its economy is in free-fall following BREXIT. 

Did the Queen’s government offer reparations to India whose estimated wealth of $45 trillion was stolen. 

Did the Queen voice her opposition to: 

Malayan Emergency (1948-1960); Repression of the Mau Mau rebellion (1952-1 960); 1953 overthrow of Iran’s democracy and theft of its oil worth $trillions. 

Covert war in Yemen (1962-1969); Propaganda offensive in Indonesia (1965-1966); January 30, 1972, the bloody Sunday massacre in Northern Ireland. 

In 1922 Balfour Declaration gifted Palestinian land to Zionists which has caused major ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their ancestral land.  

On 21 June 1948, HM Windrush arrived in Britain with, among other migrants from the Caribbean, 492 Jamaicans on-board who had been invited to the country to work; they officially disembarked from the ship on 22 June 1948 only to be returned home in 2020. Sending desperate asylum seekers to Rwanda to face an uncertain future is only the latest deplorable racist actions by HM government. From the 1950s to 1970s during the height of decolonization, British authorities launched Operation Legacy, a campaign to destroy all government records in the colonial administrations prior to their countries’ transition to independence. Administrators urged these records be burned or thrown into the sea in order to erase any evidence that could potentially “embarrass Her Majesty’s government.” 

Queen Elizabeth did nothing to alleviate the suffering of “her people”. She wielded “soft” power to deflect unwanted attention from high crimes of the empire being committed in her name. 

Perhaps a local UK citizen has the right idea: 

“Despite the best attempts of the U.K. media to disenfranchise and suppress our voices, there are many here in the U.K. who believe that the monarchy represents the very worst excesses of social inequality and injustice. 

We would like to see this archaic and ridiculous charade abolished. The United States and many other countries have rejected monarchy. Please leave us to resolve the issue ourselves, without the distraction of outside voices”.


Arts & Events

The Berkeley Activist's Calendar, September 25-October 1

Kelly Hammargren
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:13:00 PM

Worth Noting:

Rosh Hashanah begins Sunday evening and ends Tuesday evening.

City Council - The Agenda committee meets on Wednesday at 2:30 pm and the Regular City Council meeting is Thursday evening at 6 pm. A special Council meeting is listed for 5 pm on Thursday in the agenda packet on oversight of the General Obligation bond, however, this meeting is not officially posted. Links for special meetings preceding regular Council meetings usually use the same videoconference and teleconference links.



Tuesday - The 3 x 3 Committee meeting at 5 pm on Tuesday lists North Berkeley BART in the Agenda.

Wednesday – The last January 6th hearing is supposed to start at 9:30 am PDT. Agenda committee at 2:30 pm, the 4 x 4 Committee at 3 pm, Environment and Climate at 5 pm, Civic Arts at 6 pm, Disaster and Fire Safety and the Police Accountability Board both meet at 7 pm.

Thursday – Multi-commission meeting at 11 am on civic Center, Council starts with closed session at 4:30 pm, expected special meeting at 5 pm and regular meeting at 6 pm. Waterfront bike Park meeting at 6:30 pm.

Friday – Elmwood business district meets at 9 am and IKE Kiosks are on the agenda. Civic Arts Grant subcommittee meets at 9:30 am.



The Housing Element Draft Environmental Impact Report is a plan for adding 19,098 housing units not the RHNA 8,934. As stated at the Planning Commission in the presentation, the larger number is to push changing zoning in the City of Berkeley. The Comment Period ends October 17, 2022 at 5 pm. The document including appendices is over 500 pages.

https://berkeleyca.gov/construction-development/land-use-development/general-plan-and-area-plans/housing-element-update



Don’t forget to check for meetings posted on short notice https://berkeleyca.gov/



Sunday, September 25, 2022 - Rosh Hashanah begins 

Berkeley Equity Summit Series #10 2022 Candidates at 6 pm – 8:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://bit.ly/3aKPafw 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 818 2594 9827 PassWord: 028103 

AGENDA: We’ll hear from Berkeley Equity Summit Alliance members and neighbors of Friends of sponsored in Collaboration with Friends of Adeline who are Candidates, in Berkeley and Beyond 

 

Monday, September 26, 2022 – Rosh Hashanah – no city meetings 

 

Tuesday, September 27, 2022 - Rosh Hashanah ends 

3 x 3 COMMITTEE City Council/Berkeley Housing Authority at 5 pm 

Videoconference: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85038839392 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 850 3883 9392 

AGENDA: 4. Discussion/Updates Berkeley Housing Authority Programs a. Housing Choice Voucher Waitlist opening, b. Emergency Housing Vouchers c. Project-based RFP, d. Executive Director Search, 5. Affordable Housing Berkeley Updates a. Strategic Planning, b. North Berkeley BART Project, 6. Council Items, 7. Housing Bond Measure Update. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/council-committees/3x3-committee 

 

Wednesday, September 28, 2022 

AGENDA AND RULES COMMITTEE Meeting at 2:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82992582463 

Teleconference: 1-669-444-9171 or 1-833-568-8864 (toll free) Meeting ID: 829 9258 2463 

AGENDA: Public Comment on non-agenda and items 1 – 7. 1. Minutes, 2. Review and Approve 10/11/2022 draft agenda – use link or read full draft agenda after list of city meetings, 3. Berkeley Considers, 4. Adjournment in Memory, 5. Council workssessions, 6. Referrals for scheduling, 7. Land Use Calendar, Referred Items for Review: 8. a. COVID, b. Return to In-person meetings for legislative bodies, Unscheduled Items: 19. Discussion Regarding Design and Strengthening of Policy Committees, 10. Supporting Commissions, Guidance on Legislative Proposals. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/council-committees/policy-committee-agenda-rules 

 

4x4 JOINT TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING: Rent Board/City Council at 3 pm  

Videoconference: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81975393372?pwd=S21hNlFtKzJ0amRPczFneVFHVE1HZz09 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 819 7539 3372 Passcode: 282147 

AGENDA: 6. Update on implementation of Rental Housing Safety Program’s cyclical inspection process, 7. Discussion on amendments to Berkeley Housing Code, 8. Discussion/Possible policy recommendation to Council regarding Tenant Habitability Plan Ordinance, 9. Discussion/possible recommendation on signage related to Elevator Ordinance, 10. Discussion proposed demolition of 8 dwelling units at 2435 Haste, 11. Discussion proposed demolition of 8 dwelling units at 2429-33 San Pablo, 12. Update Demolition Ordinance. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/council-committees/4x4-joint-task-force-committee-housing 

 

CIVIC ARTS COMMISSION at 6 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86147520326 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 Meeting ID: 861 4752 0326 

AGENDA: 5. Chair’s Report, 6. Presentations, Discussion & Action a) Toverii Tuppa (Finnish Hall) Arts Space going to Tax Auction, b) Recap retreat, c) Role of Chairs, d) Mural Design by Rachel Wolfe-Goldsmith for James Kenney Recreation Center, e) Mildred Howard sculpture budget increase, f) Commissioner representatives on civic Center Vision Committee, 7. Staff updates, 8. Committee Reports, 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/civic-arts-commission 

 

DISASTER AND FIRE SAFETY COMMISSION at 7 pm 

Videoconference: https://cityofberkeley-info.zoomgov.com/j/1601651815 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 Meeting ID: 160 165 1815 

AGENDA: 1. Fire Dept Staff Report including Measure GG and FF Budget Updates, 4. Community Wildfire Protection Plan, 5. Fire Department Facilities Master Plan, 6. Safe Passages, 7. AB 3047, 8. Recording of Commission Meetings, 9. Review of process for evaluation and making recommendations for Measure GG and FF Tax Rates. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/disaster-and-fire-safety-commission 

 

ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE COMMISSION at 5 pm  

Videoconference: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89048281872 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 890 4828 1872 

AGENDA: 8. Update on $1.5 million just transition healthy home electrification pilot program, 9. Local Building Code Amendments, 10. Old Items a. EC Fuel station Co2 labels, b. Fuel Station CO2 labels, c. &d. Prohibition on resale of used combustion vehicles, e. Lead paint.  

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/environment-and-climate-commission 

 

POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD at 7 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82237902987 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 822 3790 2987 

AGENDA: 3. Public Comment on agenda and non-agenda items, 7. Chief Reports, 9. Old Business a. Finalize review draft proposed permanent Regulations for Handling Investigations and Complaints, 10. a. PAB Social Event. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/police-accountability-board 

 

Thursday, September 29, 2022 

MULTI-COMMISSION MEETING (PUBLIC WORKS, LANDMARKS, CIVIC ARTS) at 11 am 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81499570453?pwd=Qk9tU3BFbml2bFg0TWlmVGVTeHJGZz09 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 814 9957 0453 Passcode: 528648 

AGENDA: Presentation of Initial Civic Center Conceptual Design for Maudelle Shirek (old city hall), Veterans Building and Civic Center Park. 

(meeting notice is not posted on City Website) 

 

CITY COUNCIL Closed Session at 4:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87111562314 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 871 1156 2314 

AGENDA: 1. Public Employee Appointments a. Director of Police Accountability. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/city-council-closed-meeting-eagenda-september-29-2022 

 

CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting at 5 pm (not officially posted as of 10:23 pm on 9-23-2022)  

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476550043 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 894 7655 0043 

AGENDA: Oversight responsibilities for General Obligation Bond Measure 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/city-council-agendas 

 

 

CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting at 6 pm 

(Council meeting on Thursday September 29 instead of usual Tuesday Rosh Hashanah ends Tuesday) 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476550043 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 894 7655 0043 

AGENDA: full agenda list follows list of meetings by day of the week or use link. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/city-council-agendas 

 

WATERFRONT BIKE PARK COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 at 6:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81122718961 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 811 2271 8961 Passcode 94710 

AGENDA: Design for BMX are not available on webpage 

https://berkeleyca.gov/community-recreation/events/waterfront-bike-park-community-workshop-2 

 

Friday, September 30, 2022 

CIVIC ARTS COMMISSION Grants Subcommittee at 9:30 am 

Videoconference: https://cityofberkeley-info.zoomgov.com/j/1604123550 

Teleconference: 1-669-254-5252 Meeting ID: 160 412 3550 

AGENDA: 5. A) FY24 Guidelines Discussion eligibility, review, criteria and other policies and considerations for arts Organizations Festivals and individual artist project grants. 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/civic-arts-commission 

 

ELMWOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD at 9 am  

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84812077437 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 Meeting ID: 848 1207 7437 

AGENDA: V. Annual Budget, VIII. IKE Kiosk update 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/boards-commissions/elmwood-business-improvement-district-advisory-board 

 

Saturday, October 1, 2022 & Sunday, October 2, 2022 – no city meetings found 

 

++++++++++++++++++++ 

 

AGENDA AND RULES COMMITTEE Meeting at 2:30 pm, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82992582463 

Teleconference: 1-669-444-9171 or 1-833-568-8864 (toll free) Meeting ID: 829 9258 2463 

DRAFT AGENDA for October 11 City Council Regular Meeting 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/council-committees/policy-committee-agenda-rules 

CONSENT: 

  1. 2nd reading - 2023 Tax Rate: Transportation Network Company User prearranged trip originating in Berkeley single rider 53.775 cents, pooled 26.249 cents per user.
  2. 2nd reading - Zoning Ordinance amendments technical edits,
  3. Legislative bodies to meet via videoconference,
  4. Formal Bid Solicitations $1,628,600
  5. Amend Contract 3220192 add $100,000with Alameda Co. Network of Mental Health Clients for one additional homeless outreach staff member and extend to 12/31/2023
  6. Revenue Grant WIC projected $1,810,197 for Federal FY 2023 – 2025
  7. Expand Program Manager Series by establishing Principal Program Manager Classification and Salary Rage,
  8. Establish Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer Classification and Salary Range
  9. Assistant to the City attorney Classification and Salary,
  10. Revision of the Tool Lending Specialist Classification
  11. Contract $500,000 with Abbe & Assoc LLC for the development of the Integrated Zero Waste Management Strategic Plan
  12. Housing Advisory Commission - Harriet Tubman Terrace Tenant Support Recommend following action, Review Tenants video, Direct City Manager to investigate health and safety violations, provide dedicated tenant advocate to assist with relocation and other needs,
  13. Taplin – Regulation of Autonomous Vehicles
  14. Harrison co-sponsor-Hahn - Adopt an Ordinance adding Chapter 13.09 to BMC Prohibiting Discriminatory Reports to Law Enforcement
  15. Harrison – Referral to November 2022 AAO #1 Budget Process for $50,000 in additional traffic calming at MLK and Addison
ACTION: 

  1. CM – Amend Zoning to clarify and streamline the permit process for Amusement Devise Arcades
  2. ZAB Appeal 2018 Blake Street #ZP2021-0095 six-story multi-family residential building with 12 units (including 2 low-income units),
  3. Kesarwani co-sponsor Taplin – Residential Preferential Parking (RPP) Program expansion for West Berkeley Neighborhoods withint two blocks of commercial corridors
  4. Harrison – Refer to the Transportation and Infrastructure Commission and City Manager to consider and make recommendations regarding policy of deploying rectangular rapid flashing beacons and other treatments at dangerous or high-collision pedestrian and bicycle intersections
  5. Hahn co-sponsor ArreguinLand Acknowledgement Recognizing Berkeley as the Ancestral, Unceded Home of the Ohlone people
INFORMATION REPORTS: 

  1. Healthy Checkout Ordinance Bi-annual Review
  2. Commission on Disability FY 2022-2023 Work Plan.
 

+++++++++++++++++++ 

 

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA for THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476550043 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 894 7655 0043 

https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/city-council/city-council-agendas 

AGENDA: 

Presentation by Leilani Farha, former Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing for the United Nations 

CONSENT:  

  1. 2nd reading – Lease Agreement: 80 (North Building), 82/84 & 90 Bolivar Drive in Aquatic Park with Waterside Workshops,
  2. 2nd reading – Correction to COVID-19 Emergency Response Ordinance
  3. 2nd reading – Repeal Ordinance 7,643-N.S BMC 14.40.120 (ordinance to prohibit any heavy duty commercial vehicle on any street between the hours of 2 am and 5 am for greater than 1 hour),
  4. Urgency Ordinance Extending the Lease for Real Property at 742 Grayson for additional month $26,379 Measure P Funds
  5. Formal bid solicitations $15,891,000
  6. Contract 47QSEA21D002V $375,000 through June 30, 2024 with Gaumard Scientific Company, Inc for High Fidelity Training Equipment,
ACTION: 

  1. ZAB Appeal: 1201-1205 San Pablo Use Permit #ZP2021-0070 to construct 6-story mixed-use building on a vacant lot, 66 units (including 5 very low income units), 1680 sq ft of commercial space, 2614 sq ft of usable open space, and 17 to 28 ground-level parking spaces, staff recommends dismiss the appeal,
INFORMATION REPORTS: 

  1. City Auditor - Audit Recommendation status – Berkeley Police: Improvements Needed to Manage Overtime and Security Work Outside Entities
  2. City Auditor – New Audit Recommendation Dashboard – Dashboard shows status of audit finding recommendations and progress toward resolving finding
 

+++++++++++++++++++ 

 

LAND USE CALENDAR: 

Public Hearing to be scheduled 

1201 – 1205 San Pablo (construct mixed-use building) 9/29/2022 

2018 Blake (construct multi-family residential building) 10/6/2022 

1643-47 California (new basement and 2nd story) 11/3/2022 

Remanded to ZAB or LPC 

1205 Peralta – Conversion of an existing garage 

Notice of Decision (NOD) and Use Permits with the End of the Appeal Period 

Bad news on tracking approved projects in the appeal period. Samantha Updegrave, Zoning Officer, Principal Planner wrote the listing of projects in the appeal period can only be found by looking up each project individually through permits online by address or permit number https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Online-Building-Permits-Guide.pdf 

 

The website with easy to find listing of projects in the appeal period was left on the “cutting room floor” another casualty of the conversion to the new City of Berkeley website.  

Here is the old website link, Please ask for it to be restored. 

 

WORKSESSIONS: 

September 29 Oversight responsibilities for General Obligation Bond Measure special meeting time 5 pm 

October 11 Measure O Report and Update at 4 pm 

Unscheduled Presentations 

Civic Arts Grantmaking Process & Capital Grant Program 

Fire Facilities Study Report 

African American Holistic Resource Center (November 15) 

 

Kelly Hammargren’s on what happened the preceding week can be found in the Berkeley Daily Planet www.berkeleydailyplanet.com under Activist’s Diary. This meeting list is also posted at https://www.sustainableberkeleycoalition.com/whats-ahead.html on the Sustainable Berkeley Coalition website. 

If you would like to receive the Activist’s Calendar as soon as it is completed send an email to kellyhammargren@gmail.com. If you wish to stop receiving the weekly summary of city meetings please forward the weekly summary you received to kellyhammargren@gmail.com 


Dover Quartet at Hertz Hall

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Tuesday September 27, 2022 - 03:58:00 PM

On Sunday afternoon, September 25, Dover Quartet, which was hailed by BBC Music Magazine as “one of the greatest string quartets of the last 100 years,” performed at UC Berkeley’s Hertz Hall under the auspices of Cal Performances. Dover Quartet is comprised of Joel Link, 1st violin, Bryan Lee, 2nd violin, Hezekiah Leung, viola, and Camden Shaw, cello. On the program for this concert were Franz Joseph Haydn’s Quartet in C Major, Op. 76, No. 3, Emperor; the Quartet for Strings (in one movement) by Amy Beach; and Felix Mendelssohn’s Quartet in E-flat Major, Op. 44, No. 3. 

Haydn’s Emperor Quartet is so named for its slow second movement based on a hymn Haydn had just composed in January 1797 in honour of Austria’s Emperor Franz II. This quartet’s opening movement is in sonata-form and uses a simple five-note motive to generate a lively series of variations on this theme. Energy is provided by the vigorous dotted rhythms. The second movement also proceeds on a single theme, the hymn asking God’s protection of Emperor Franz II. Each member of the Dover Quartet took up this noble theme in turn, until the final variation offered the theme in the high register of Joel Link’s 1st violin. The third movement is a Menuetto that starts out in a major key then moves into a minor mode for the Trio section. The fourth and final movement is a stormy sonata-form Finale set in C minor rather than the home key of C Major. Along the way, abrasive multi-stopped chords dominate this stormy Finale, strenuously performed here by Dover Quartet, along with frenzied triplet rhythms, until near the end Haydn returns to the home key of C Major. 

Next on the program was Amy Beach’s Quartet for Strings (in one movement). Amy Beach, an American composer who lived from 1867 to 1944, is to my mind one of the greatest unheralded American composers. I first encountered her work while listening to a late-night broadcast on the Bay Area’s classical music radio station KDFC. What I heard that night was Amy Beach’s Piano Concerto, which struck me as endlessly inventive, brimming with technical virtuosity, and full of surprises. Though a consummate pianist herself, Amy Beach’s husband limited her public appearances to two a year. After her husband’s death in 1910, Amy Beach turned to the MacDowell Colony for Artists in New Hampshire to introduce many of her compositions to the public.  

Amy Beach’s Quartet for Strings is based on Inuit themes, which enables the composer to break from the late Romantic style and explore more modern harmonics. It opens with a dark, brooding passage marked Grave that avoids any sense of key and proceeds dissonantly. Then Dover Quartet’s violist Hezekiah Leung sings the “Summer Song” with its Inuit melody in G minor. This viola solo will be heard two more times. However, Joel Link’s 1st violin plays the second Inuit melody, “Playing at Ball.” This slow section closes with a repeat of the viola’s “Summer Song.” 

Moving to a faster rhythm, a third Inuit melody is heard: “Ititaujang’s Song,” which is joined by fragments of the other two Inuit songs. A high-speed fugue then closes this section. Harsh, dissonant chords then announce a return to the Grave opening motive, which strikes a meditative note that persists to the close with a return of the viola’s opening theme. Throughout this stark, dissonant work, Dover Quartet’s violist Hezekiah Leung played beautifully and was highlighted in this splendid Amy Beach Quartet for Strings. 

After intermission Dover Quartet returned to perform Felix Mendelssohn’s Quartet in E-flat Major, Op. 44, No. 3. This work, given the number 3 among the Op. 44 quartets, is actually the second to be completed by Mendelssohn, who put the finishing touches to it the day before his first child was born in February 1838. The high-spirited opening movement, marked Allegro vivace, offers a dazzling array of elements, with the 1st violin leading the way and often followed by the cello. In the recapitulation section, the 2nd violin takes the lead. Finally, the viola takes the lead accompanied by pizzicato from the other three instruments. 

The second movement is a splendid Scherzo which shows off Mendelssohn’s mastery of Bach’s legacy of counterpoint. A humorous fugue is almost turned into a complex double fugue with a chromatically descending countersubject. The third movement, marked Adagio non troppo, is a lovely slow movement in A-flat Major though hinting at minor mode shadows throughout. The fourth and final movement, marked Molto allegro con fuoco, sparkles with superficial brilliance that somehow never rises to the sublime achievements of this quartet’s first three movements. 

All in all, however, Dover Quartet offered a masterful rendition of this strikingly successful string quartet by Felix Mendelssohn.


San Francisco Symphony’s Opening Night Gala

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Monday September 26, 2022 - 03:07:00 PM

On Friday, September 23, San Francisco Symphony kicked off its 2022-23 season with an Opening Night Gala Concert and After-Party. Music Director Esa-Pekka Salonen led the orchestra, chorus and guest artists in music from Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream by Felix Mendelssohn. African-American Shakespeare Company performed scenes from Shakespeare’s play interspersed between music Mendelssohn composed for each scene. Mendelssohn’s music for A Midsummer Night’s Dream actually spans nearly his entire career, since his Overture was composed in 1826 and in 1843 he added music for seven scenes from Shakespeare’s play. 

The Overture, once rewritten in its final form by Mendelssohn, beautifully encapsulates the fairylike atmosphere and plot of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. In this concert, the Overture received a splendid rendition led by conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen, and at its conclusion the Davies Symphony Hall audience gave the orchestra and its conductor an appreciative ovation. 

Then L. Peter Callender, artistic director of African-American Shakespeare Company, stepped forth to introduce the first of seven scenes from Shakespeare’s play about a group of Athenians gathering in the woods for a midsummer night’s celebration. Following this came the scampering Scherzo music with solo flute that accompanies Puck’s encounter with an elf. Puck was humorously played by actor Jonathan Moscone. As the play develops, we meet various characters such as Lysander, played by Rodney Jackson, Hermia, played by Tyra Fennell, Demetrius, acted by Devin Cunningham, and Helena, acted by Lisa Vroman. These young people engage in amorous pursuits of one another. We also meet the characters Hippolyta/Titania played by Debbie Chinn, Theseus/Oberon played by L. Peter Callender, and the comical character Nick Bottom played by Chris Sullivan. Now and then, plot details are filled in by narrators Raj Mathai and Tony Bravo. 

Next we heard the Act II song “You Spotted Snakes,” containing some of Mendelssohn’s most evocative fairy music. This song was beautifully performed by a pair of soloists who are Adler Fellows at San Francisco Opera: soprano Anne-Marie MacIntosh and soprano Elisa Sunshine. The soloists were splendidly accompanied by members of the San Francisco Symphony Chorus, whose director is David J. Xiques. Meanwhile, as the play developed, one slight drawback was the fact that several of the actors had not memorized their lines and simply read them from printed notes they held in their hands. Though this tended to break the dramatic illusion, some of these actors nonetheless gave highly expressive readings of their lines; and only one actor seemed a bit hesitant and unsure of herself. In any case, the plot involves Puck’s efforts, at the urging of Oberon, to first mix up the amorous couples with a magic flower’s sap that puts them to sleep and ensures that when they awaken they will fall in love with the first person they see, and later to reverse this ploy and restore the lovers to their original partners. The music for the sleep scene is Mendelssohn’s elegiac Nocturne with its splendid horn solo. And of course the comic highlight of the play occurs when Nick Bottom is fitted with an ass’s head and Titania, Queen of the Fairies, awakens to fall in love with this grotesque donkey. 

Once Puck’s ploy is reversed and the original lovers are restored, a wedding ensues uniting all the lovers in this play marked by Mendelssohn’s famous Wedding March, elegantly performed here by the SF Symphony. Next we heard the African-American Shakespeare Company perform the play-within-a-play involving Pyramus and Thisby plus a character who plays “the wall” that separates these doomed lovers. When both Pyramus and Thisby die by self-inflicted wounds, and once the actor playing “the Wall” has taken her bows, a Funeral March by Mendelssohn ensues. And the evening’s entertainment concludes with a Finale that brings the SF Symphony Chorus back for one last song in which the fairies wish everyone with good fortune; and the orchestral music comes to a close with a repeat of its opening chords.