Full Text

 

News

Updated: Citizens and Applicant Appeal Downtown Project Approvals to the Berkeley City Council

Becky O'Malley
Wednesday October 28, 2015 - 03:30:00 PM

Multiple appeals were filed on Tuesday to decisions by the Berkeley Zoning Adjustment Board and the Berkeley Landmarks Preservation Commission to allow construction of a complex of three structures, the tallest of which would be more 18 stories high, on the landmarked site of the Shattuck Hotel and the Landmark Shattuck Cinemas. There would be more than 300 market rate apartments in the project, but no on-site affordable or low-income units. 

Citizen appellants are asking the Berkeley City Council to overrule the decisions of the lower bodies, ZAB and LPC. Incorporated in the appeals are challenges to the Zoning Adjustment Board's vote to certify the Environmental Impact Report on the proposed project which the applicants offered, which appellants contend does not adequately inform commissioners of environmental harm which the projects might cause. 

Appellants include the Landmark Legal Action Fund, the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association, the Sustainable Berkeley Coalition and the Berkeley Unified School District, along with several other organizations such as the Berkeley Gray Panthers, Save Shattuck Cinemas, the Peace and Justice Committee of the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship and more than a hundred individual Berkeley citizens who co-signed one or more of the appeals. 

The project, which has been named The Residences at Berkeley Plaza, is using the address of 2211 Harold Way, but the longest facade of the conjoined buildings would be along Shattuck at the corner of Kittredge, with some construction underneath the historic hotel itself, part of which would be demolished if the plan goes through. 

Another appeal was filed by the project applicant's representative, Mark Rhoades of the Rhoades Planning Group, who is a former City of Berkeley Planning Department employee. 

The appeal documents can be found by scrolling down on this Planning Department web site: 

http://www.cityofberkeley.info/Planning_and_Development/Zoning_Adjustment_Board/2211_Harold.aspx 

Below is the complete list of appeals filed, along with the names of the people who delivered the appeal documents to the Berkeley City Clerk's office. The office has not yet announced when the appeals will be heard at the City Council. 

 

Appellant - LPC  

 

 

 

John McBride – LPC Appeal  

Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association 

 

 

 

Kelly Hammargren – LPC Appeal  

Sustainable Berkeley 

Save Shattuck Cinemas 

Gray Panthers, Berkeley 

Peace and Justice Committee, Unitarian Universalist Fellowship 

Additional Named Individuals 

 

 

 

Charlene M. Woodcock – LPC Appeal  

Landmark Legal Action 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appellant - ZAB  

 

 

 

Clarissa Canady & Deidree Sakai – ZAB Appeal  

Dannis Woliver Kelley Law Firm on behalf of the Berkeley Unified School District 

 

 

 

Mark Rhoades – ZAB Appeal  

Rhoades Planning Group 

 

 

 

Kate Harrison & James Hendry – ZAB Appeal  

Additional Named Individuals 

 

 

 

Margot Smith – ZAB Appeal  

 

 

 

Charlene M. Woodcock – ZAB Appeal  

Landmark Legal Action 

Additional Named Individuals 

 

 

 

 

Kelly Hammargren – ZAB Appeal  

Sustainable Berkeley 

Save Shattuck Cinemas 

Gray Panthers, Berkeley 

Peace and Justice Committee, Unitarian Universalist Fellowship 

Additional Named Individuals 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


New: The Berkeley City Council "Hopes" for Housing (Opinion)

Steve Martinot
Thursday October 29, 2015 - 10:19:00 AM

At the Berkeley City Council meeting on Tuesday night, they considered a measure proposed by District 8 Councilmember Lori Droste to relieve developers of the necessity to put parking spaces in new buildings, hoping that the developer will use that space for more affordable housing. The word heard during the discussion from a number of councilmembers was indeed "hoping." The developer would still have the option to use the space for market rate housing (according to the law, i.e. the Palmer decision).

During public comment, I mentioned that since "affordable" housing is especially for working people of the city (among others), many of whom commute to their jobs, a place to keep a car is still necessary. Given the state of public transportation in Berkeley, as District 6 Councilmember Susan Wengraf pointed out, travel to jobs is most often very problematic. The impression I got from the stony-faced look of the councilmembers was, “well, those aren’t the kind of people we want in this town any more anyway.” 

Given the housing crisis (and some of the students pointed out that they have to squeeze six people into space for three in order to come up with the rent), if you build market rate housing or moderate income housing, that space doesn’t trickle down. You have to build low income or very low income housing, in order for the space to trickle up. Think of it this way. Those paying 80% of their income for rent will be the ones looking for housing at lower rent where they only pay 50% of their income. That will leave the higher rent apartments available. The look that got from the council said, “What you are saying is just totally beside the point.” 

It is beside the point because the economic structure this all happens in will result, from Droste’s proposal, in increased market rate housing without on-site parking. The proposal also assumes that if the developer chooses market rate units, that money will be contributed to the Housing Trust Fund. It forgets that the Fund contributions are non-enforceable, and developers have not been paying into it. 

In brief, Droste’s measure will free developers to put in housing rather than provide space for cars for tenants. When stated like that, it seems to be favoring housing, rather than cars. But because the type of housing (target income level) is not specified (and cannot legally be specified), it will mean market rate housing, which will not affect or correct the housing crisis, and not low income housing, which is what is needed. By not specifying the income level of the housing to be required by developers, the proposal, and the council’s sentiment in favor, are a sham. 

Why cannot developers be required to put in low income affordable housing units? There are several reasons, besides the Palmer decision of 2009, which made cities liable for loss of profit to developers from affordable housing. One reason is the mitigation fee, paid in lieu of building affordable housing. Its unenforceability makes it a joke. 

Another reason is that developers are corporations. This means that they will go for highest profitability, first of all. But it also implies that they must to be able to recapitalize their projects if real estate value ever take a dive. This requirement hinges on the use of the building itself as collateral for the loans necessary to build it. Without that ability, their financing will be in jeopardy. And they will face higher interest rates to compensate for the increased risk. Thus, they are caught in the debt structure that corporate operations mostly require. 

Though Droste’s measure seemed to focus on affordable housing, the council only spoke about "developers," and the council’s "hopes" that low income housing would be built. But the council also expressed the hope that this measure, which the proposal states only pertains to "inclusionary" housing (market rate buildings that "include" some affordable units), would close some of the loopholes that developers have. Those loopholes were not spelled out in the discussion. Neither are they spelled out in the proposal. 

What is borderline horrendous in the proposal is that its "theory" of the benefit of reducing parking space in new development is based on studies done in other cities, such as New York, Portland, Seattle, etc., not Berkeley, and not taking into account the predominant aspects of transportation in California. There are those who can live without a car, depending on their employment situation and location. But California society is based on the car. To simply impose a no-car paradigm on people is to greatly restrict them. Until a truly extensive public transportation system is developed, as the necessary infrastructure for Droste’s theory, her proposal has social misery written all over it. It is just another example of how city council thinking really amounts to imposition on neighborhoods, rather than taking the time to listen to them. 

Some comic relief was offered to this tragic spectacle by a proposal to "lend" the Housing Trust Fund a million dollars (ostensibly from the city’s General Fund, whose size is a carefully kept secret). A million dollars, these days, would be a drop in the bucket in terms of building new affordable housing. It won’t even buy a single family house in most sections of the city. It could be used to rent a whole lot of apartments, if the city wanted to do that for the homeless, for instance. But since that idea has been proposed at least five times to council people, and never made it to the agenda, it seems they are not interested in anything that "radical." 

We have a situation in which the council is useless, not because they don’t mean well (some of them mean well), but because they operate in an economic environment that makes it impossible for them to do the right thing. The only possibility they have, while doing the wrong thing (permitting the building of more market rate housing) is to make pleasant platitudes about how fewer cars will be good for the planet and how they hope that more housing will be available to the people without taking the time to really address the real need for housing, which would require specifying the income levels for that housing. 

If the neighborhoods of Berkeley are to survive, they are going to have to do it on their own, with some new alternate political structures, and some real political clout developed and manifest locally in those neighborhoods themselves. Otherwise, we’ll all be dislocated and relocated by the corporate whirlwind that is now gentrifying the bay area. 

 


Irish President Thanks Berkeley Balcony Collapse Responders

Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Wednesday October 28, 2015 - 10:41:00 PM

The President of Ireland, Michael Higgins, came to Berkeley today to meet and thank emergency crews who responded to the collapse of an apartment balcony that killed five Irish students in June. 

"As President and representative of the people of Ireland, I am truly honored to stand among you today to pay tribute and give thanks for your extraordinary work and service," Higgins said at a reception for first responders at the Hotel Shattuck Plaza, which is near the Library Gardens apartment complex at 2020 Kittredge St., where the balcony collapsed at a boisterous birthday party at 12:41 a.m. on June 16. 

Higgins, who shook hands with the first responders, said, "This tragedy has had an enormous effect on the Irish people. The loss of life and the serious injuries visited on young men and women at the cusp of their adult lives is a tragedy which has moved all of us very deeply." 

He added, "We know that it has affected you also. You share this tragedy with us and we join you today in solidarity and thanks for what you have done to help those who have suffered so much as a result." 

The fourth-floor balcony suddenly gave way during the party on June 16, dumping 13 people to the ground. Six people were killed and seven were injured. Five of those killed were 21-year-old Irish nationals who were visiting the Bay Area on J-1 visas, which allow visitors to participate in work and study exchange programs. 

Ashley Donohue, 22, of Rohnert Park, was also killed. 

Higgins thanked Donohue's parents, Jackie and George Donohue, for attending the reception, saying, "I appreciate your solidarity at this time of great grief." 

Higgins told the first responders, mostly Berkeley police and firefighters and Alameda County sheriff's deputies, "Your combined efforts brought this community together in its desire to respond, to reach out and to help. We saw the best of leadership and care, which watched over and guided the Community's response." 

The President said, "We in Ireland were deeply touched as we saw you stand hand in hand with the families as they mourned their loved ones and as you shared in their grief. We are also deeply grateful for the practical assistance that was provided in helping families to arrange for the remains of their loved ones to be brought home." 

Flaws in the balcony's construction have come under scrutiny since the accident and prompted the Berkeley City Council to adopt amended building codes to prevent similar accidents in the future. A city analysis concluded moisture intrusion rotted wooden joists, causing the deck's collapse.  

The state Building Standards Commission decided at its meeting last week to re-examine state building codes in the wake of the tragedy. 

Joining Higgins at the reception, Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates said the City Council passed a second resolution on Tuesday night "to make sure something like this never happens again." 

He said the resolution calls for inspectors to be present when apartment balconies are constructed and to conduct periodic reviews of balconies.] 

Bates said the balcony collapse "may have been the most devastating event in the history of the city" and thanked the first responders for working day and night to help those who were injured and prevent additional problems. 

Among those who attended the reception was Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, whose office is conducting a criminal investigation into the balcony collapse. 

O'Malley said engineers recently conducted destructive testing of the balcony and the results will be scientifically analyzed. 

She said the purpose of the investigation is to determine whether the collapse was caused by gross negligence, not just ordinary negligence. 

When she announced the investigation back in June, O'Malley said she hoped it would move forward as expeditiously as possible but added that the statute of limitation for involuntary manslaughter charges is three years so her office theoretically has that long to complete its probe. 

After the reception, Higgins and Bates went to the Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park to plant arbutus samplings in memory of the Irish students who lost their lives or were injured and to symbolize the friendship between Berkeley and the people of Ireland. 

Higgins arrived in San Francisco on Sunday after visiting Washington, D.C., last week. 

He will wrap up his California visit on Thursday with a meeting with Gov. Jerry Brown and depart for Ireland on Friday.


Pedestrian Hit by Car at Berkeley's Gilman Off-Ramp

Dennis Culver (BCN)
Saturday October 24, 2015 - 12:56:00 PM

A pedestrian suffered major injuries Friday after being struck by a vehicle in Berkeley. 

The collision occurred at 7:26 p.m. on the westbound Interstate Highway 80 off-ramp at Gilman Street, according to the California Highway Patrol. 

The pedestrian, identified as a man, was transported to the hospital with major injuries to the head. 

Investigators said a Kia was traveling west on Interstate Highway 80 and onto the Gilman Street off-ramp when the man walked into the direct path of the vehicle and was struck. 

The incident closed the Interstate Highway 80 off-ramp at Gilman Street for about an hour. 

The driver of the Kia was not injured.


Press Release: Jesse Arreguin Announces Candidacy for Berkeley Mayor-- Two-Term Councilman Running to Make Berkeley Work for Everyone

from the Jesse Arreguin for Mayor Campaign
Friday October 23, 2015 - 04:28:00 PM

Today two-term Berkeley City Councilmember and longtime community leader Jesse Arreguin announced he will be a candidate for Berkeley Mayor in the November 2016 election. Councilmember Arreguin launched his candidacy with an email to supporters this morning and with a new campaign website at www.Jesse.vote.

“We need a Berkeley that works for everyone,” said Councilmember Arreguin. “That’s why I’m running for Mayor. As I’ve done on the City Council and throughout my career, I’ll bring our city together and get results, so Berkeley moves forward and carries on our tradition of strong progressive leadership.”

Arreguin cited the affordability crisis as the number one challenge facing the next Mayor. 

“We must ensure Berkeley remains a diverse and vibrant city,” said Arreguin, “That means protecting and expanding affordable housing and fighting displacement. It also means tackling health, economic, and educational disparities, so everyone in Berkeley has the opportunity to succeed.” 

Arreguin is also running on a platform of modernizing City government and making Berkeley’s public services more innovative and efficient. 

“For such a forward-thinking community, the technologies our City uses to serve the public are incredibly out of date,” said Arreguin. “Our core services - from fire and police response to permitting and pothole repair - could be made much more responsive and efficient. But it’s going require some fresh thinking and a Mayor who embraces the future.” 

Arreguin will kick off his campaign for Mayor with a crowd of supporters on Thursday, November 12 at 6 pm [http://www.jesse.vote/kickoff]. 

“I’m looking forward to the campaign,” said Arreguin, “And to engaging in conversation with residents in every corner of Berkeley about the kind of future we want for our city.” 

 

### 

 

ABOUT JESSE ARREGUIN 

 

As the son and grandson of farmworkers, a passion for social justice runs deep for Jesse Arreguin. At the young age of 9, Jesse volunteered with the effort to re-name San Francisco’s Army Street after his hero César Chavez. His public service continued through his youth and college years, and in 2008 he became the first Latino and youngest person ever elected to the Berkeley City Council. For the past 7 years, Councilmember Arreguin has represented our vibrant Downtown and portions of North Berkeley. He has also served as a Planning Commissioner, Rent Board Chair, and Sierra Club Boardmember. 

On the City Council, Jesse has proven to be an effective consensus builder. He has helped move the City away from polarization, working constructively with his colleagues, local business, and community leaders to craft practical, forward-thinking solutions on pressing city issues. He has a demonstrated record of results, working to expand affordable housing, support local business, revitalize Downtown, and protect our environment. 

Jesse Arreguin will be a dynamic, hands-on Mayor, who will put forth the energy, vision, and smart, 21st Century solutions needed to bring residents from every neighborhood to the table and give people from all walks of a life a stake in Berkeley’s future. And as he has done throughout his life, Jesse will champion social and economic justice for children, families, and seniors as the next Mayor of Berkeley.


State Building Commission Considers Changes Responding to Berkeley Balcony Collapse

Stefan Elgstrand
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:30:00 PM

In the wake of the tragic balcony collapse at 2020 Kittredge Street in Berkeley that claimed the lives of six people, the California State Building Standards Commission, which has authority over all state building codes, is considering changes to strengthen standards for balconies and other exterior elevated elements. 

The Building Standards Commission and the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) agreed to start a public process to develop stricter standards for balconies and other exposed building elements. Commissioners also expressed the urgency to deal with waterproofing issues and the need to learn from the lessons of this tragedy. The Commission unanimously voted to discuss exterior elevated elements at a future meeting where they are likely set to form an ad-hoc committee to further discuss reforms. Additionally, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) stated their interest in forming a Task Force to discuss statewide balcony safety and construction reforms. 

This decision came at the request of the Berkeley City Council who sent a letter (attached) on July 16, 2015 requesting the use of steel and other building materials to prevent future balcony failures statewide. Councilmember Jesse Arreguin, who originally introduced the letter as a package of housing safety reforms, praised the move. 

“We can’t let another tragedy happen again. While Berkeley is leading the way, we need to take a statewide approach to improve the safety of housing” Councilmember Arreguin said. “I am very happy that the state Building Commission is committed to addressing this issue and will move forward in the future with policy changes that will save lives.”


Motorcyclist Killed by Rear-Ending Minivan

Daniel Montes (BCN)
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:32:00 PM

A motorcyclist was killed when he rear-ended a minivan on Interstate Highway 80 in Berkeley this morning, according to the California Highway Patrol. 

At 9:17 a.m., CHP officers responded to a report of a collision in the highway's westbound lanes, near Ashby Avenue, according to CHP officials. 

Once at the scene, officers located a 2010 Honda Odyssey minivan and a 2015 Ducati Diavel motorcycle that had been involved in a collision, CHP officials said.  

The motorcycle rider sustained major injuries as a result of the collision and emergency crews performed CPR on him. He was then taken to Highland Hospital, where he died from his injuries, according to CHP officials. 

The CHP closed two of the highway's lanes for about an hour and a half, as they investigated the collision. 

The preliminary investigation revealed the two vehicles had been traveling in the same westbound lane of the highway, just east of the Ashby Avenue exit, according to CHP officials. 

For an unknown reason, the motorcyclist rear-ended the minivan and was ejected from his bike. 

CHP officials do not believe the motorcyclist was traveling in between lanes when the collision happened. Additionally, CHP officials do not believe drugs or alcohol were a factor in the collision. 

Anyone who witnessed the collision is asked to contact the Oakland CHP office at (510) 450-3821.


Trying to Get Rid of A Couch

Jesús Iñiguez
Friday October 23, 2015 - 04:19:00 PM

I have a couch that I want out of my apartment.

It's not the best couch, it's kinda ugly and a bit weathered down. Needs a makeover of sorts. Not gonna lie: it's kind of not the greatest couch. Kept it for so long because of sentimental (though mostly financial) reasons, but absolutely ready to let it go as much as it (doesn't) pain me. 

It's a couch bed. A bed couch. You can pull out a bed and sleep on it. It's as uncomfortable as the next foldout bed couch. I prefer to keep the mattress in and just sleep on it as a couch instead of a bed, but either way, it's not better than sleeping on a bed. Some couches are more comfortable than a bed. Not this couch. 

I'd like this couch out by this weekend. If you want to come through and take it, it's yours for free. If you want photos, hit me up. If you hit me up about this couch after Sunday, most likely, it'll be at the dump. I was thinking about just leaving it out on the sidewalk, but I think folks would give me the side-eye about this charming eye-sore. 

If anything, it's the perfect couch on which cats and dogs would love to kick it. Humans might definitely enjoy it as well, but... I'm not gonna try and sell it to y'all in this respect. 

I don't expect any responses about this couch, honestly. I think I'm just excited and happy about having a new couch in my apartment. 

Nonetheless. If you want it, holler at me. 


This posting first appeared on Nextdoor Elmwood,


George Stickle Oram, 1935-2015

Georgina Stuart Oram
Friday October 23, 2015 - 04:12:00 PM

George Stickle Oram, Berkeley, California, died on Saturday October 3rd. He was just three weeks shy of his 80th birthday.

My dad was a big man with a big heart. It was probably the muscle he exercised the most often. Those who knew him well could recount many stories in which he took a chance on a person or a place and threw his entire trust into that endeavor because his heart told him to do it. When describing him to friends, I say he’s like Forrest Gump. He lived a long life and was around for a number of pretty remarkable things. He is going to be severely missed by his family, friends, and the large community that grew around him. 

Although my dad lived the last 30 years of his life in Berkeley, he left a lot of his heart in New Jersey where he grew up, met his first wife, and had his first two children Wendy and Thomas. As a member of the family who was raised in California, I have only eaten corn that “must have been from New Jersey” because it tasted so good. 

My dad was proud of everything he did - from growing up on his dad’s dairy farm, to graduating from the Peddie School, Phillips Exeter, and Princeton - conversations with him easily turned to stories of drinking the cream off the top of fresh milk and getting into trouble with his classmates. When our family took long drives across California we would find ourselves pulled over on the side of the highway so my dad could say hello to the cows. We also once found ourselves outside of my dad’s dorm at Princeton where he showed up a bush that still hadn’t grown back because of his tom-foolery. My dad loved connecting with all kinds of people and learning their stories - what made them tick. To this day, he read the Princeton Alumni Weekly and was so excited when he made a facebook and could reconnect with all kinds of folks from his past. 

In the spring of my dad’s senior year, IBM had a hiring dinner to which he was invited. At this dinner, according to him, everyone was sitting around the table terribly nervous so my dad thought - I’ll go ahead and start the conversation. He was the only one in that group to be hired. He worked as a salesman at IBM for many years, taking a two year hiatus when he was drafted into the military. After this he headed computer systems for Johns Masville where he worked with a computer that took up entire floors of New York high rises. 

His next job took his family to Chevy Chase, Maryland. Princeton had taught my dad a huge amount of civic duty - so he took a job as the Administrative Director for the Home Loan Bank Board during the Nixon, Ford and Carter administrations. Once, when I was standing outside of the White House, I called my dad and he directed me to a building two blocks away. Turns out, he had worked with an architect to design and build the whole thing! He was so proud. 

While living in Chevy Chase my dad spent a lot of his time sailing a classic bugeye, the two masted sailboat originally used to dredge for oysters on the Chesapeake. He cooked crab cakes for our family years later, recounting making crab cakes on board for friends. He also played golf and coached my half siblings, Wendy and Tom, in hockey. 

In the early 1980s, my dad followed his heart yet again and moved Wendy and Tom with him to California. As a young boy he had spent a summer in Carmel while George Sr. was stationed in the Pacific during WW11. They moved into what is still our family’s Berkeley home in 1984. He became a real estate agent, and founded Elmwood Realty in 1986, and met my mom Mary. They met and were married in 8 months after my dad refused to sell her a house and proposed. He was a man who knew what he wanted. After getting married in 1986, my mom joined my dad at ERI and they ran it as a family business together for over 20 years. Through real estate they became very active in Berkeley politics, and the Berkeley Property Owners’ Association and our living room became a place familiar to Monday night action committee meetings. Typically accompanied by a bowl of chilli or some kind of sweet - if my dad could convince my mom to make it. 

In 1998 the managers of the Julia Morgan Center for The Arts came to my dad looking to sell the theater. They had three tenants -The Berkeley Ballet Theater, for which my sister and I danced, a yoga studio and a preschool. When he was asked by the owners for help in selling it, he told him they didn’t need to sell it. What they needed was a new manager, and he volunteered. 

In the two years he took the theater under his wing he expanded the programs developing Theater Rats, a children’s theater camp, new uses for the theater and many self-produced concerts. He found great joy in connecting with the Bay Area Arts community through booking the theater, arranging publicity, establishing a children’s theater camp, and hosting many performances. 

In the last years of his life, my dad slowed down a lot. But he still had so much love to give. He connected with friends who would come to visit him at the house and found restaurants around Berkeley where he became a regular for lunch. He has always loved talking to strangers, and in the last few years I think he probably met everyone in Berkeley. 

About two years ago, I was sitting across from my Dad at Tuk Tuk Thai on Shattuck avenue when a woman walked in wheeling a baby in a stroller. My dad, who always had to sit at a restaurant facing the door, immediately made eye contact with the woman, and she came right over to introduce him to the baby. I told her at the time that she had made his day. 

My dad gave so much love to the world, and I hope he passed peacefully knowing that it was all coming back to him as well. From his family, from his close friends, and from women who wheeled their babies over to say hello. 

I miss you so much, dad. 

George is survived by his wife, Mary Elsner Oram, of Berkeley, his brother, Peter Dewes Oram of New York City, the children of his marriage to Joan Shippee Oram (deceased)--daughter Wendy and her four children of Maui, Hawaii, son Thomas King Oram of Oakland, and the children of his marriage to Mary--daughter Elizabeth Grace Oram of Oakland, daughter Georgina Stuart Oram of Berkeley. 

There will be a memorial service Friday, November 13, 2015 at 1:30 pm at the Julia Morgan Theater at 2640 College Ave, Berkeley, CA. All are invited to join. If you have memories of George you would like to share please send them to gsoramjr@gmail.com


Opinion

Editorials

The Chase Commences in Berkeley

Becky O'Malley
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:51:00 PM

Well, the gong just sounded for the opening of the Berkeley hunting season. No, it’s not a gun-totin’ hunt, nor are foxhounds on the program, and I’m not sure that hunts of any description start with a gong, but you get the idea. Jesse Arreguin is off and running for the job of Mayor of Berkeley, and the rest of the pack can’t be far behind.

Time was that Councilmember Laurie Capitelli would have been leading the pack at the heels of the first entrant, but that looks a little sketchy at the moment. It seems clear that he took some sort of kickback on the sale of a house to Police Chief Michael Meehan, after voting for the city to give Meehan a half-million dollar loan. The exact details of Red Oak Realty’s internal accounting don’t make much difference—the point is that Capitelli shouldn’t have taken a cent on the deal, regardless of what his payment was called in the books, or how much it was. As we said at length last week, it all just demonstrates poor judgement, not something Berkeley needs in a mayor.

Which kind of opens things up a bit, doesn’t it? 

There are two main parties in Berkeley politics these days. The one running things now, under the auspices of the Hancock/Bates dynasty, might be called the Kansas City party.  

You remember the song, don’t you? 

Everything's up to date in Kansas City 

They gone about as fer as they can go 

They went an' built a skyscraper seven stories high 

About as high as a buildin' orta grow. 

A major part of my forty plus years in Berkeley has been spent under the auspices of the kind of civic boosterism that rivals the small town hubris satirized in this song from Oklahoma. It’s promoted of course by those who would like to do just one more thing to make it even better, at a nice profit to those in the building industry, who have funded most of our recent elections. 

That would include Capitelli and his ilk. 

Here’s a sample dialogue from the show they're putting on: 

“Berkeley is so lucky to have a BART station in our revitalized downtown!” 

“Yes, but let’s get rid of those unsightly beggars and while we’re at it spend a few millions rebuilding the entrance to the trains, oh, and how about adding some more apartments and maybe a hotel or two? This will surely get people out of their cars.” 

Uh-Huh.  

In fact, the other Berkeley party could be called the “Party of Uh-Huh”—a very diverse collection of those who don’t buy into the dominant narrative, but don’t necessarily agree with one another all the time either.  

Let’s unravel a few threads in this patchwork quilt. 

First, and longest lasting, is the group that used to be called “the grumpy old men”. These stalwarts, mostly but not all white, some but not all small-time landlords, believed that the city government was on the path to fiscal ruin, collecting excessive taxes and fees and wasting them on pointless projects and extravagant compensation for city employees. I was first aware of this group sometime in the early 80s. Most of them have now died or moved away to retirement, but the city has not yet come crashing down around our ears, contrary to predictions. The originals been replaced in the civic discourse by a couple of somewhat more sophisticated women, but the tune’s still about the same. Now let’s just call them all “The Grumpies”. 

Then there’s the "Beautiful City” crowd. 

This is not exactly the same as the 20th century CIty Beautiful movement , which Wikipedia describes thus: 

“Advocates of the philosophy believed that such beautification could promote a harmonious social order that would increase the quality of life, while critics would complain that the movement was overly concerned with aesthetics at the expense of social reform; Jane Jacobs referred to the movement as an ‘architectural design cult.’ “ 

Now, paradoxically, Jane Jacobs has been canonized as her very own cult. In Berkeley’s contemporary version of City Beautiful, the two streams have merged to an extent.  

The Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association, for example, recognizes that we inherited a remarkably lovely civic fabric from earlier generations, but they lament the obvious evidence of neglect that has occurred in Berkeley since Tom Bates has been mayor: historic city amenities built in the past, including the old City Hall, the Veterans’ Building and the Rose Garden are rapidly decaying. The lovely clubhouse in John Hinkel Park is gone, another example of demolition by neglect, though the Post Office has gotten a five-year reprieve.  

Many of today’s Beautiful City believers, unlike their predecessors perhaps, recognize a need for social reforms like increased density, especially in the form of affordable housing. They just want whatever is built to be elegantly executed. 

This is where the Beautiful group overlaps with what might be called, for lack of a better term, the Authentic Progressives. These are the people who continue to believe that the major function of government, especially city government, is to provide certain amenities for citizens as a group that they couldn’t afford as individuals. Currently, first and foremost, that would be things like affordable housing, public transit, farmers’ markets, public parks, recreational facities like Willard Pool and the Berkeley Pier, and even (godforbid) parking garages. They also overlap with The Grumpies, because it costs money to build and maintain this stuff, so it’s better not to waste it on foolishness, they think. 

Another substantial strand of Berkeley thought is concerned with civil liberties, especially where less fortunate and most vulnerable citizens are affected. These activists defend the rights of street people of all kinds, and many support the Black Lives Matter movement. 

And these are only a few of the many caucuses which make up the Uh-Huh Party in Berkeley politics. We could go on for pages enumerating them all.  

Ideally, one might hope that all these groups would agree that Berkeley should be beautiful, functional, cost-effective and fair to all, but that’s a tall order. What’s certain is that if they could all manage to vote for the same candidate, they might defeat the Kansas City Party in November of 2016.  

But it would be a mistake to discount the longstanding organizational power of the incumbent Kansas City crowd. Anyone who knows anything about the real Kansas City (and I’m from Missouri) knows that in the olden days it was run by the Pendergast machine. The political organization that put Mayor Tom Bates and his majority, including Laurie Capitelli, in place is still around, though its last anointed candidate lost to upstart Assembly candidate Tony Thurmond (endorsed by Jesse Arreguin). 

It would be a mistake to characterize the November election as a left-right battle, since it will really be a referendum on the status quo emanating from all points on the spectrum. If Arreguin wants to be elected mayor of Berkeley, he’ll need to be able to communicate clearly and effectively to convince all the vast variety of Uh-Huhs who could be his supporters. And if Capitelli now looks iffy as the KC candidate, it will be interesting to see who might replace him. Or even who might try. The name of developers’ advocate Mark Rhoades has been mentioned as a possiblity, but surely not… 


The Editor's Back Fence


Public Comment

Drone attacks – death by Metadata

Jagjit Singh
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:49:00 PM

One of the most secretive military campaigns in U.S. history has come under intense scrutiny by investigative reporters of the Intercept who recently published its report, “The Drone Papers”

The White House assassination program commenced in 2002 with the drone strike that killed six civilians in Yemen including one US citizen. Condoleezza Rice, a senior advisor to President George Bush alleged that the White House reserved the right to assassinate anyone in the world based on actionable intelligence “that the president could never reveal in public”. Thus, nobody could ever be held accountable - how convenient! Under the Obama administration, drone attacks in Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan have intensified with hundreds of civilians, including many children, being blown apart – using highly faulty intelligence as the Intercept report revealed.  

The bureaucratic kill chain consisted of senior White House and Pentagon officials who would decide who would live and who would die without any judicial review starkly reminiscent of old style emperors. The target would be designated as an “imminent threat” to the U.S. giving the military 60 days to hunt down and kill the target.  

Reporters at the Intercept interviewed Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, who confirmed that “signal intelligence” is an extremely unreliable method of identifying a target and without doubt resulted in a significant number of innocent victims being assassinated. This was further confirmed by Ryan Devereaux’s report on "Manhunting in the Hindu Kush" which examined a JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) campaign called “Operation Haymaker” which initially claimed a high degree of success hunting down leaders of al-Qaeda – but later admitted that 88 percent of those killed were innocent civilians. Killing innocent victims of war no doubt emboldens the enemy and makes a complete mockery of our much touted “core values”. 

A Congressional hearing should be convened calling for an immediate halt to drone attacks and demands that all those found responsible for these hideous mass killings of innocent victims be held fully accountable.


Berkeley City Council Jeopardizes Your Health

Harry Brill
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:28:00 PM

By refusing to pass paid sick leave legislation for working people, the majority of the Berkeley City Council have been jeopardizing your health. Many low income workers, who cannot afford to lose any pay, feel compelled to come to work sick. Whether customers are exposed to a sick waiter or waitress, eat from dishes set by a sick employee, or eat the food prepared by an ill cook, customers are unknowingly endangering themselves by being exposed to contagious diseases. 

Take for example the Shigella bacteria outbreak that began in a San Jose restaurant. It has affected so far over 110 people. Symptoms include diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. It can be fatal with patients who have severe symptoms. Significantly, the infectious disease spreads when food or water has been handled by contaminated hands or by an infected person. 

In addition to restaurants and other retail businesses, the adverse impact on health is a problem in all other businesses as well. Co-workers are always endangered. And by not staying home sick workers risk the further deterioration of their own health. Many people who contract the flu and other illnesses have had direct or indirect contact with workers who should have stayed at home taking care of their health. 

So except for many employers who care about nothing other than the bottom line, everybody else potentially loses. Enlightened employers provide sick leave. But most employers do not. It is therefore the moral obligation of the City Council to protect the interests of the public as well as the workers themselves. 


Please contact the mayor and city council members demanding that Berkeley workers receive at least one week of full pay if they become ill or if a member of the family needs their care. 

The following email address reaches the mayor and all members of the City Council: council@cityofberkeley.info


The Invisible Man – A CIA Vendetta

Tejinder Uberoi
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:46:00 PM

Jeffrey Sterling is the first African-American case officer to file a suit against the CIA for racial discrimination. The CIA countered with its own suit charging Sterling with nine felony counts including espionage. They accused Sterling of passing on details of a botched up CIA effort to derail the Iran nuclear program to James Risen of the New York Times. Risen reported that the CIA details may have actually aided the Iranian government nuclear program and stubbornly refused to reveal his source. The CIA counter-suit appears to have little to do with protecting national security but more to do with punishing Sterling for filing his discrimination suit. Sterling’s case is the subject of the documentary short, ‘The Invisible Man’. 

hThe case is extremely important for preserving civil liberties and freedom of the press and the public’s right to know, with informed consent, in what’s supposed to be a democracy.


Selection of the Speaker

Romila Khanna
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:40:00 PM

It is very important for members of Congress to recognize that the speaker has a difficult job. A good speaker must have the capacity to unite its members behind legislation that will be good for the nation. But we have had a divided congress for the past many years and the speaker could not get the members of his own party to agree. It may be a lesson for the person will put on former speaker John Boehner's hat. 

In all this time money was spent on wild discussions and meaningless prolonged debates. It is normal to have differences of opinion, but politics is defined as the art of compromise. For some reason the unselfishness of compromise has vanished from Congress even if hardened positions have spread suffering over the land. The budget was not passed in time. The job market was crushed. Families lost jobs. Many became homeless. It is high time that members of the Congress choose someone who is wise, and can guide members towards healthy compromise for the sake of the nation.


Columns

ON MENTAL ILLNESS: Some Amount of Comfort is a Necessity

Jack Bragen
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:38:00 PM

If someone is stuck in a delusional system or otherwise psychotic, or is in a severe manic or depressed state, it is too much to ask, if you are expecting them to come out of it, medicated or not, if their environment is adverse.  

This is one of the reasons that a good housing situation is so essential for persons with mental illness. If someone is stuck in a jail, or in a psychiatric ward (at least, one that has overstimulation and/or mean and nasty mental health workers) it is not an environment in which you can expect a recovery. Many of the board-and-care housing situations are not monumentally better.  

In my recovery I have benefited from having blocks of time in which there were no demands, and in which the environment was safe and peaceful. This is the same sort of peaceful environment needed by meditation practitioners, something you could see for yourself any time you visit a Zen monastery.  

Recovery from psychosis is like a sub-enlightenment in which a very basic clarity is found. Many of the conditions required by meditation practitioners are the same ones needed by people recovering from a psychiatric illness.  

When we feel safe and comfortable with most of our needs met, it is a space in which we might be able to sift through the thoughts and emotions and arrive at a better state of mind.  

People in recovery from a psychiatric illness benefit from a place to call our own. We benefit from having enough to eat and not going hungry. We benefit from the absence of an external threat. We benefit from having income given to us, such that we don't have to work to survive.  

Right now, the housing prospects for persons with disabilities are generally atrocious. Many disabled persons are forced to live in institutional situations, and some are either homeless, or live in a jail cell. This is not the "kinder gentler nation" promised by a politician of the past whose name I won't mention. This is a travesty. This is where the most vulnerable of human beings are put into the most brutal of living situations.  

We need affordable, clean, secure, comfortable, air-conditioned, heated homes, and we can not make a good recovery without this. Meanwhile, we are looking at further cuts to Section 8 housing certificates. In theory and often in practice, Section 8 is a good program and allows persons with disabilities to have a decent place to live. Many things about Section 8 could be better, but without it, disabled people could be forced to live in awful living situations or could be homeless.  

Medication is another thing that can bring comfort or that can bring agony. We need to be on the right medications that allow physical and mental comfort--otherwise it is impossible to think.  

Medications with too many side effects, such as motor restlessness, a stiff torso, dry mouth, and the inability to relax, either should not be prescribed, or should be given in moderate dosages. Medications intended to minimize anxiety and depression should be prescribed. Just giving someone a horrible antipsychotic and telling him or her to "deal with it" is not good treatment.  

Tobacco use (and I am probably a hypocrite for bringing this up) in the long run is anti-comfort. You are chained to the smoke and are highly uncomfortable in its absence. The long term effects, such as wrecked lungs and a wrecked heart, cause a great deal of suffering--and this isn't comfortable. I do not recommend it.  

Alcohol use and narcotics use are the same deal, you can't get comfortable without your bottle, your shot or your toke. Thus, drug, tobacco, or alcohol addictions make it harder to recover from mental illness.  

Comfort food, in moderation, can be a good way to relax and calm down. Depriving oneself of food or eating too far in excess of what you need are additional impediments to overall comfort and make it harder to recover. Any physical illness or health problem, especially those involving a lot of physical pain can make it harder to recover.  

Getting pushed past the comfort zone is fine if you are well into recovery and ready for a challenge. However, too much discomfort too often, or too early into recovery, can be bad for recovery from a mental illness. It is fine to have challenges and responsibilities in which the need for comfort is temporarily out the window. But, at some point, we all need to relax.


DISPATCHES FROM THE EDGE:Turkey’s Election Turmoil

Conn Hallinan
Friday October 23, 2015 - 04:31:00 PM

As Turkey gears up for one of the most important elections in its recent history, the country appears, as one analyst noted, to be coming apart at the “seams”: 

*Longstanding tensions with the country’s Kurdish population have broken out into open war. 

*A Kurdish-led left political party is under siege by rightwing nationalists and the terrorist organization, the Islamic Front. 

*Independent journalists have been attacked by mobs led by leading members of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. 

*Erdogan, his family, and leading figures in the AKP have been entangled in several major corruption schemes. 

*The economy has stalled, inflation is on the rise, unemployment is at a five year high, tourism is tanking, and the Turkish lira is plunging, driving up the national debt. 

All Turkey lacks these days is a rain of frogs and rivers of blood, but there is still time before Nov. 1 election. 

Some of these plagues are long standing, but most are the direct result of Erdogan’s determination to reverse the outcome of last June’s election that saw the AKP lose control of the parliament, and the President’s grand plan for an all-powerful executive—run by him—died aborning. 

In the June 7 election, Erdogan’s AKP lost its absolute majority in the legislature. The defeat was mainly due to a breakthrough by the Kurdish-led, leftist, People’s Democratic Party (HDP) that took 13.1 percent of the vote and won 80 seats, seats that in the past usually went to the AKP. 

Almost before the final tallies were announced, Erdogan moved to prevent the formation of a government and force another election. Key to this has been an all-out campaign to suppress the HDP and prevent the party from getting at least 10 percent of the vote, the required threshold for representation 

And in true Old Testament fashion, he has unleashed the furies. 

First, he ended negotiations and a two-year old ceasefire with the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) and began bombing Kurds in Syria and Iraq. He also charged that the HDP was a front for the PKK and demanded that the HDP’s dynamic leader, Selahattin Demirtas, be charged with supporting terrorism. HDP offices have been targeted by rightwing nationalist mobs from the AKP and the extreme rightist National Action Party. 

Several anti-Erdogan newspapers and magazines were also set upon, attacks that the government either ignored or belatedly condemned. 

The kind of suicide bombings that plague much of the Middle East have made an appearance. Some 32 leftist Kurdish activists were killed July 20 in the border town of Suruc, and on Oct. 10 a peace demonstration in Ankara organized by the HDP was bombed, killing more than 100 people and wounding hundreds more. 

While the culprit in both cases was likely the Islamic State, paranoia is running rampant these days. Turkish Prime Minster Ahmet Davutoglu blamed the PKK—extremely improbable, given that the rally was protesting the war against the Kurds—and HDP leader Demirtas blamed the government. Others charge it was the work of the National Action Party’s “Gray Wolves,” a shadowy death squad that killed thousands of Kurds and leftists in the 1980s and ‘90s. 

Not only did the government remain silent for several days after the massacre, Turkish security forces broke up memorial demonstrations in Ankara and Istanbul. 

A decade ago, Turkey was at peace with its neighbors, its economy was humming, democracy was flowering, the country’s coup-minded military relegated to the barracks, and the 40-year war with its Kurdish population appeared to be over. Turkey, with its efforts to find a peaceful solution to the nuclear crisis with Iran, had also become an international player. 

Today, Turkey is engaged in an unpopular war in Syria, its economy is troubled, its people are polarized, its relationships with Egypt and Israel are hostile, the Kurdish peace is shattered, and democracy is under siege. It has alienated Russia, Iraq and Iran, and even failed to get re-elected to the UN Security Council. 

What happened? 

Much of it goes back to the man who has dominated Turkish politics these past 12 years, and who would like to run the country for another decade, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He bears limited responsibility for some of this. For instance, the economy is bad, but so are most economies worldwide. But much of what has happened in Turkey—for good and bad—is in large part due to his creation of a moderate Islamic regime that curbed the power of the military and the secular elites who had dominated Turkish politics since the nation’s foundation in 1923. 

Erdogan and his allies—allies he has since fallen out with—reined in a military that had carried out four coups since 1960. He also made peace with the Kurds, ending a war that took 40,000 lives and cost $1.2 trillion. A side benefit for that was that many rural and religious Kurds migrated into the AKP, giving it a significant edge over all other parties in the parliament.  

But things began to go off the rails in 2010, when the Arab Spring took the Middle East by storm and Turkey made two fateful steps: backing insurgents trying to overthrow Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The first step trapped Ankara in a quagmire, wrecking its relations with Russia, Iraq and Iran, and the second was a bad bet: the Egyptian military, bankrolled by Saudi Arabia, overthrew the Brotherhood in 2013. 

It is all this sturm und drang that makes these elections so critical for the AKP, and Erdogan in particular. A failure to win an outright majority will be seen as a repudiation of the Kurdish war, Ankara’s Syria policy, and may resurrect the corruption changes that the AKP has managed to dodge so far. “For him, this is existential,” one former Turkish official told the Financial Times. “There is still accountability in this country and he knows it.” 

This “existential” nature of the Nov. 1 vote is the reason why Erdogan has pulled out all the stops, but polls show that the outcome is likely to be much like last June’s election. The AKP may pick up a percentage point or two, but it will fall far short of the majority it requires to push through its constitutional changes and create an all-powerful presidency. 

The polls also show that Erdogan’s major pre-election target, the HDP, may do slightly better this time around, in part because he has totally alienated the Kurdish community. The Kurds make up 20 percent of the population and about 17 to 18 percent of the voting population

If the polls are correct, Turkey will have a divided government, and that will create its own dangers. 

First, there are the President’s increasingly authoritarian stratagy. 

Erdogan, for instance, says he is no longer bound by the constitution because he is the first directly elected president in Turkish history. He won that post with 52 percent of the vote in 2014. Presidents are normally appointed by the parliament and are supposed to be non-partisan. Abdurrahim Boynukalin, the leader of the AKP’s youth wing and a deputy in the parliament, said recently that, “Whatever the results of the election on November 1, we will make him [Erdogan] the leader.” 

Second, the AKP may form an alliance with the ultra-rightwing National Action Party, which would almost certainly mean an escalation of the war against the Kurds and put into positions of power an organization that celebrates violence and is openly contemptuous of democracy. While the merger would still not give the AKP the 400 seat super majority it needs to amend the constitution, it would have a chilling effect on political activity. 

There is also the possibility of a “grand coalition” government with the secular People’s Republican Party, the second largest in the parliament. But that would require sharing power, not one of Erdogan’s strong suits. 

There are, however, strong counter-trends. 

In spite of Erdogan’s flirtation with authoritarian rule, Turkey is still a democracy, and its military shows no interest in intervening in civil affairs. Indeed, there is some unrest in the military over the Kurdish war, and the government has been denounced at several military funerals. The military has also made it quite clear that they have no interest in getting involved in the Syrian civil war. 

Erdogan calculated that re-igniting the Kurdish war would unite the country behind him, but it has not turned out that way, and his international allies are lukewarm about the whole endeavor. While saying that Turkey had the right to defend itself, The Europeans and the U.S. call for a “proportional” response, not the massive bombing Ankara has launched on Kurds in Northern Iraq and Syria. 

Of course, the allies discomfort is a reflection of the fact that while the AKP government draws no distinction between the Islamic State (IS), the PKK, and the latter’s Syrian offshoot, the Kurdish Democratic Union, the allies consider the Kurds their most reliable and effective forces against the IS. The Turks recently complained to Russia and the U.S. about their arming of Syrian Kurds, a complaint that neither country is likely to pay much attention to. 

The Syria war has been a disaster for Erdogan. Some 63 percent of Turks oppose the AKP’s Syria policy, and only 20 percent back overthrowing Assad. Over 65 percent oppose one of Erdogan’s fixations, the formation of a buffer zone inside Syria.  

And, while in the past the AKP can say it delivered on the economic front that is a hard sell these days. 

The next few weeks will be fraught with danger. The AKP and the ultra-nationalists will try to suppress the vote, particular in Istanbul and the Kurdish east and south. The PKK declared a ceasefire for the election, but the Turkish government has ignored it. Will Erdogan use the war as an excuse to cancel the election in the Kurdish regions? 

Erdogan may even refuse to accept the results of the election if the AKP does poorly, and he has already demonstrated his willingness to use violence. His brutal crushing of the 2013 Gezi Park demonstrations is a case in point. 

But Erdogan can no longer claim the support of a majority of the Turks, and what he does internally will be watched closely by the international community, focused as it is on the refugee crisis that the Syrian war has generated. 

In less than two weeks, the Turks will vote in an election that will have major regional and international implications. Its outcome may decide whether the Middle East slides deeper into war and chaos, or begins to move in the direction that the Arab Spring originally envisioned. 

 


Conn Hallinan can be read at dispatchesfromtheedgeblog.wordpress.com and middleempireseries.wordpress.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


THE PUBLIC EYE:The End of the Republican Party

Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:35:00 PM

The latest Huffington Post Poll of Polls estimates that three “outsider” Republican presidential candidates (Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, and Donald Trump) account for more than 50 percent of primary votes. We’re witnessing a civil war within the GOP. Is this the end of the Republican Party? 

In the most recent Real Clear Politics 2016 Republican presidential nomination summary Donald Trump has an aggregate 26.2 percent, followed by Ben Carson at 21.2 percent, and in sixth place Carly Fiorina with 5.6 percent; the three outsider candidates have 53 percent of the vote. (Adding in maverick Senator Ted Cruz the outsiders have 61.4 percent.) Obviously, GOP voters want to elect a candidate who is not part of the Republican establishment. 

Grassroots Republicans are revolting. Does this mean the GOP is finished? 

The Party is barreling towards chaos. Writing in the New York Times, Republican insider Peter Wehner observed, “Republicans prefer an outsider to a candidate with experience in the political system by a 24-point margin (60 to 36).” He attributed the frustration of the GOP grassroots to a series of disappointments. The first was President Obama’s reelection, “The fact that he easily won… was a huge psychological blow to Republicans.” The second has been the failure of the GOP congressional majority to “rein in” President Obama, “Many on the right refuse to recognize the institutional constraints that prevent lawmakers from doing what they want them to do, which is use their majority status in Congress to reverse the early achievements of the Obama presidency.” The third is a profound sense of failure, “a widespread sense of doom,” the feeling they’ve lost the country. (Wehner observed that Trump gives voice to this GOP gloom with his campaign line, “the American dream is dead.”) 

We’re witnessing a profound conflict between the Republican establishment (the insiders) and their most ardent constituents (the outsiders). In Wehner’s words, “The struggle within the Republican Party right now centers on those who… want to rebuild the village and those who want to burn it down.” 

This shouldn’t come as a surprise. For the last 25 years, the GOP has been a volatile coalition. Pew Research Center described three red groups: “steadfast conservatives” about 15 percent of registered voters, “business conservatives” about 12 percent of registered voters, and “young outsiders’ about 15 percent of registered voters (Some call the “young outsiders” Libertarians as they have conservative views on government but not on social issues.) In 2016, the “steadfast conservatives” are the Republican outsiders; the “business conservatives” are the Republican insiders; and the “young outsiders” are split between the two camps. 

According to the latest New York Times poll about 21 percent of Americans identify as Tea-Party members; they are the steadfast conservatives in the Pew Research study. There are enough Tea-party voters to control the Republican primary, but not enough to carry a general election. Thus, an outsider candidate, such as Donald Trump, may win the Republican nomination, but suffer a devastating defeat in the general election, because his gloomy message coupled with his misogyny and anti-immigration sentiments will turn off non-conservative voters. 

In the 2000 presidential race, Republicans didn’t have this problem because George W. Bush appealed to all wings of the Party. That was not true in 2008 and 2012 when steadfast conservatives did not favor John McCain and Mitt Romney. This year there’s an enormous problem because of the ideological chasm between the insider and outsider candidates. 

Donald Trump has suggested that if the Republican Party doesn’t treat him fairly, then he will start a third Party. Speaking as a liberal Democrat, it would make sense for the Republican Party to split into two wings: the “business as usual” Party (insiders) and the “maverick” Party (outsiders) – those who follow Trump. 

Overlooking the logistical problems inherent in splitting the Republican Party, the practical consideration is that it’s unlikely that the presidential candidate of either of the two new parties – Trump (outsider) or Bush (insider) – would win the 2016 general election. Moreover, it’s unlikely that either of these new parties would win control of either wing of Congress. (The Democrats are likely to win back control of the Senate.) If there were to be three parties, after the 2016 election, the US would be faced with the necessity for a coalition government in the House of Representatives. For example, the new Speaker of the House would have to be elected by a coalition of Democrats and “business-as-usual” insiders, as no Party would have a clear majority. 

This sounds difficult but it’s the situation the House of Representatives is in at the moment. To elect Paul Ryan Speaker of the House, a coalition was formed: “business-as-usual” Republicans plus enough “mavericks” to ensure a majority. Another coalition will be formed to raise the debt ceiling. 

Formally splitting the Republican Party into two pieces may not happen soon, but it makes more sense than the current arrangement where the Party has two wings with vastly different values and policies. 

Happy Halloween! The Republican Party is dead but lives on as a two-headed zombie. 


Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net


Arts & Events

Jafar Panahi's Taxi—A Taxi to the Light Side By

Gar Smith
Wednesday October 28, 2015 - 04:18:00 PM

Opens October 30 at the Landmark Shattuck Cinemas

Taking in Jafar Panahi's relaxed manner and sweetly smiling face, you wouldn't judge him to be an enemy of the state. You might not take him to be a world famous film director, writer and producer either. The truth is, Panahi is Iran's most renown film artist. The rest of the truth is deeply ironic: most Iranians have never seen his work. It's been banned.

 

 

 

Panahi's first effort, The White Balloon (which won the Camera d'Or in Cannes in 1977), is the only film that Iran's rulers have allowed the country to see. Meanwhile, outside of Iran, Panahi has racked up a long string of international film festival awards for movies including The Mirror (2000), The Circle (2000), Crimson Gold (2003), and Offside (2010). 

In 2010, however, the director's career was seriously derailed when the government accused him of making "propaganda" and sent him to prison to serve a six-year term. Talk about harsh critics! The authorities in Tehran also imposed a 20-year ban on any further filmmaking. 

A torrent of pleas and protests from filmmakers and filmgoers around the world eventually convinced the authorities to release Panahi after 83 days. The campaign intensified when word leaked out that Panahi had gone on a hunger strike to protest his incarceration. 

Despite having been jailed twice for picking up a camera, Panahi remains unbowed and irrepressible. Within months of his release, he produced a new work (strategically titled "This Is Not a Film"). 

Panahi has continued to violate his "terms of probation" by returning to the director's chair. This Is Not a Film won the 2012 Jury Prize at Cannes and Closed Curtain was honored with a 2013 Silver Bear prize at the Berlin Film Festival. Making "unauthorized" films puts Panihi at risk of a new six-year sentence but he remains undeterred. 

In his latest unauthorized film (set to debut in the US this week), Panahi puts himself in front of the lens and assumes a cinéma vérité role as a sometimes bumbling cab driver navigating the streets of Tehran. Panahi's a bright yellow cab is tricked out with dash-cams that capture his encounters with scores of ordinary women, men and children whose behaviors, conversations, and reactions range from the ordinary to the outlandish. 

This film will leave you wondering: Do most cab drivers encounter such a variety of humanity in the course of an average day? In Panahi's case, his fares include two superstitious women racing to place the lively contents of a goldfish bowl in a nearby lake (to ward off death, no less) and a woman in the backseat wiping blood from the face of her badly injured husband as he struggles to locate a cell phone so he can record his dying wish—that his property should go to his wife, and not to his brothers. 

One of the passengers is a plant: Panahi's actual neice, Hana Saeidi, pretends to be a student filmmaker assigned the daunting task of producing a documentary that will win the approval of the government censors. (With a lively mix of hilarity and impatience, she proceeds to itemize the many ways in which a filmmaker can run afoul of government watchdogs.) 

All the while, Panahi sits behind the wheel, impersonating a cabbie. Smiling through it all, nodding sympathetically as the cameras record hassles, jokesters, confessions, and complainers. It all goes to prove that—despite the demonizing rhetoric of pandering politicians in the US—Iranians are really just like the rest of us. Instantly recognizable in their endearing and exasperating humanity. 

So, if you want to experience some highly entertaining social interactions in an exotic foreign locale, take a ride in Jafar's cab. You won't regret it. 

And let's hope Panahi has no cause for regret, either. As the director and his fans understand all too well, each time he makes a new film, "it could be his last." 


Press Release: Dazzling Divas Sing Opera Favorites at Le Bateau Ivre on Wednesday

Arlene Giordano
Saturday October 24, 2015 - 01:15:00 PM

This week, on Wednesday, Oct. 28, Le Bateau Ivre welcomes The Dazzling Divas.  

Opera singers Pamela Connelly, Kathleen Moss and Eliza O’Malley light up the hall with arias, duets and trios from celebrated operas of Puccini, Verdi, Bellini, Bizet, Delibes and more . Come indulge yourself in a dazzling evening of opera’s top hits with these Bay Area favorites, accompanied by delicious food.  

* DINNER SEATING: Begins at 5:00pm
* PERFORMANCE: 7:00 - 9:00pm - No Cover Charge. Come early for a nice seat.

Le Bateau Ivre is at 2629 Telegraph Avenue , Berkeley . Delicious dinners, desserts, and beverages of all kinds. Please bring a friend and join us at Le Bateau Ivre for an intimate evening of enjoyable music. Looking forward to seeing you all here.


Press Release: San Francisco Chamber Orchestra: IN PRAISE OF LOVE

Saturday October 24, 2015 - 01:08:00 PM

Free Concert on Sunday

On their first Main Stage program of the season, concertmaster Robin Sharp takes center stage to perform Leonard Bernstein's 1954 Serenade, inspired by Plato's famous symposium on the nature of love. An earlier experiment in sound and color was Claude Debussy's 1904 Danses Sacrée et Profane, written for harp and strings. Three short, captivating works for multiple percussionists round out this wide-ranging program.

Benjamin Simon, conductor, Robin Sharp, violin, Meredith Clark, harp

Sunsay, Oct 25, 3pm @ First Congregational Church, Berkeley


Truth: Cate Blanchett, Robert Redford and the Swift-boating of Dan Rather and CBS News

Gar Smith
Friday October 23, 2015 - 03:42:00 PM

Opens October 23 at the Century 9 and Sundance Kabuki in SF

Opens October 30 at the Shattuck Landmark in Berkeley

As if Jeb Bush didn't have enough to worry about, Sony Pictures has started airing TV commercials reminding America that his brother, W, "may have gone AWOL from the military," "He never even showed up." The ads are promoting a new movie called Truth that examines how George W. evaded serving in Vietnam and how a CBS exposé wound up taking down the most respected journalist in America.

Screenwriter and first-time director James Vanderbilt signals his intensions from the first scene: Get ready for some intense verbal clashes in a high-stakes clash between political power and the First Amendment. The film starts with a combative meeting between embattled 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes (Cate Blanchett) and her attorney. Blanchett quickly gets ticked off and angrily pops a Xanax. It's a Blue Jasmine moment. Like her Oscar-winning performance in Woody Allen's 2014 film, this is Blanchett in another rip-roaring, pedal-to-the-metal, emotional road-race. Robert Redford (as iconic CBS anchor Dan Rather) is just along for the ride.

 

 

 

.The Discovery of the 'Bush-Guard" Memos 

Vanderbilt's film is based on Mary Mapes' book, Truth and Duty: The Press, The President, and The Privilege of Power, and is set in 2004. Mapes has just produced an award-winning exposé on US torture abuses at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison when she gets word of a bundle of documents that apparently detail how presidential candidate George W. Bush used his political connections to avoid being drafted and sent to fight in Vietnam. Instead, Bush was assigned to serve in the Texas Air National Guard (TANG). But the documents from 1968 and onwards revealed that Bush not only shirked combat duty, he also apparently stopped showing up for stateside duty. 

The documents confirmed that Bush initially performed well in the TANG, both at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia from May 1968 and at a fighter squadron in Houston. But in 1972, Bush was suspended for missing a physical. (This lead to the rumors that Bush may have had a "substance abuse" problem.) At one point, Bush was reassigned to Alabama so he could work on a Republican Senate campaign being run by a family friend. From May 1972 to May 1973, the records showed no evidence that Bush even bothered to show up for duty. Neither his supervisors nor fellow pilots reported ever seeing him. In September 1973, Bush requested and was granted an early discharge so he could enroll in the Harvard Business School. 

If the Documents Were Hoaxes, It's a Scandal 

Four different document analysts assured CBS that the copies presented appeared genuine. In a 60 Minutes interview, former Texas Lt. Governor Ben Barnes confirmed that he used his clout to secure Bush a pilot's seat in the Texas Air National Guard. In a phone conversation with Mapes and others, Major General Robert Hodges confirmed that the contents of the documents reflected the critical assessment Bush's superiors had of a young pilot who missed assignments and enjoyed preferential treatment. 

The story looked solid and air-tight but, within hours of the broadcast, the report was attacked by a legion of conservative bloggers who raised pointed questions about inconsistencies in the documents, suggesting they had been produced on a computer, not a '60's-era typewriter. 

As Truth unfurls, Rather and Mapes and their team are subjected to an onslaught of accusations, insults and abuse. Eventually, even their superiors at CBS begin to turn their backs on their star producer and legendary anchor. 

The story is no longer about the truth of Bush's service. It is the would-be truth-tellers who are being pilloried. CBS calls for an investigation. Hardly impartial, it impanels more than a dozen corporate lawyers (many with conservative allegiances). Everyone on the news team is sanctioned. Mapes, alone, is fired. Rather is subjected to public humiliation—forced to go on air with an apology—and he resigns soon after. 

Vanderbilt and his crew execute the story with nail-biting pacing and emotional body blows. Blanchet's Mapes—despite her great reserves of authority and self-confidence—suffers tremendously as her corporate superiors abandon her and push her from her career-perch in the upper stories of Black Rock, CBS's fabled highrise on W. 52nd Street. 

We learn that one of the personal ghosts Mapes has to deal with involves being raised by an abusive father. And just when someone most needs a father to come to her defense, Mapes hears her dad doing a press interview and berating her both as a professional and as a person. It's infuriating and Blanchet's reaction is heart-wrenching. 

Redford as Rather? Who Would You Rather Have? 

Redford is an interesting choice to play Rather. Redford is not a character actor (it would be easier to imagine Josh Brolin in the Rather role) but there are several reasons why this casting choice works. Redford and Rather are friends and both are cultural legends. Using the logic of "get a legend to play a legend," Redford merely approximates Rather's on-air posture and calm, baritone delivery. Vanderbelt even permits Redford's Rather to appear as a reddish-blond facsimile of the CBS Evening News' familiar dark-haired icon. 

Redford effectively channels his personal knowledge of Rather's off-air nature and marvelously captures one of Rather's unseen signature moments when—after the broadcast ends and the cameras are cut—he rises from his chair behind the anchor's desk and shucks his coat, liberating his arms and revealing his trademark suspenders. 

The Decline of News as a Public Service 

At one point, as Rather and Mapes wryly commiserate over drinks on a glittery Manhattan night, Rather muses about the history of TV news. At first, he recalls, the three major networks were required to produce news programs as a "public service" in exchange for the government's granting of potentially lucrative broadcast licenses. "But then," Rather says, "they realized that the news was something that could make money." 

Once the delivery of news was removed from the realm of "public service," it was only a matter of time before it became just another part of the corporate budgeting process. And eventually, in the name of efficiency and cost-cutting, CBS (and the other networks) began to close foreign news bureaus and reduce the number of field reporters. Rather ruefully notes that modern news programming now is often little more than one network reporting on what another network already has reported. Network news has lost its independence. The journalist's once-proud calling has become a product, without an edge, without risks, homogenized and subservient. CBS, NBC, ABC and the rest are now just addendums to the corporate media empire. 

This is a truth that makes Truth an especially bitter pill. 

If the Documents Were Hoaxes, It's Even Worse 

There is another chapter to this story that still needs to be written. The fact remains that bulk of the charges in the 60 Minutes broadcast were true. The record was there to corroborate. 

As Blanchett's Mapes tells a Star Chamber of corporate lawyers: "Our story was about whether the president fulfilled his service. Nobody wants to talk about that. They want to talk about fonts and forgeries and they hope to god that the truth gets lost in the scrum." 

If we accept the critics' charges that the documents were in some way fraudulent, that raises a larger and more ominous prospect: If the Bush-Guard documents were forgeries, who created them and why? 

The story of the origin of the documents is beyond cloak-and-dagger bizarre. Bill Burkett, the former Texas Army National Guard lieutenant who provided the documents initially lied to 60 Minutes. He subsequently claimed that the papers were handed to him by two mysterious strangers who told him to make copies "and burn the originals." (Why would these strangers leave it to Burkett to destroy the originals they had handed over?) 

Another oddity: The attacks on the documents' legitimacy began within hours of the 60 Minutes broadcast when the conservative blogosphere swarmed CBS (and competing news organizations) with detailed criticisms citing arcane inconsistencies involving fonts, formatting, spacing, kerning and a rare superscript—the kind of minutia that even the 60 Minutes document analysts had missed. 

In retrospect, it begins to resemble a set-up—a highly organized response that was prepared in advance to do as much damage as possible in the shortest amount of time. 

The Swift-boating of Dan Rather 

Remember, this was the same presidential campaign that saw Democratic presidential contender John Kerry vilified by the notorious "Swift-boating" campaign, which called into question his military service. 

Although Kerry was the candidate who actually went to Vietnam and faced combat, it was Kerry's record and not George W. Bush's that became the subject of obsessive "in-depth" news coverage. 

George W's history became a "non-issue." Once the authenticity of a single set of documents was questioned, no other reporter could (or would dare to) raise the matter of Bush's military service for fear of being discredited. Despite the damning nature of his existing military record, Bush was granted immunity. 

If we are to believe that the 60 Minutes documents were forgeries, we need to ask who was behind them and why were they created? 

One answer to the first question is: only a well-financed and skilled intelligence operation could have conceived and executed such a conspiracy to deceive. The answer to the second question is even more chilling. 

If the Bush-Guard documents were forgeries, they may have been created to be used in a sophisticated disinformation campaign to not only draw attention away from the Republican candidate (whose father, after all, was head of the CIA before becoming our 41st president) but also to destroy the career of Dan Rather, thereby sending a clear message to the rest of the journalism community that there was only so much truth that the power structure was willing to tolerate. 

For More on George W. Bush's military history, see: 

George W. Bush’s Military Lies:  

The real story about the undeniable service gaps he got away with 

Paul Rosenberg / Salon (October 17, 2015) 

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/17/george_w_bushs_military_lies_the_real_story_about_the_undeniable_service_gaps_he_got_away_with/


Cypress String Quartet Plays Beethoven at Maybeck Recital Hall

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Saturday October 24, 2015 - 01:12:00 PM

Celebrating their 20th Anniversary as a group, the Cypress String Quartet opened their 2015-16 season with two concerts at Berkeley’s Maybeck Recital Hall in their salon series. The first concert, on Friday, October 16, featured String Quartet No. 6 by George Tsontakis and Beethoven’s majestic Op. 130 Quartet, which latter was performed with its original finale, Die Große Fugue. For the second concert, which I attended on Friday, October 23, Beethoven’s Op. 18, No. 1 Quartet replaced the Tsontakis and was followed after intermission by the Op. 130 Quartet. 

The Cypress String Quartet is comprised of Cecily Ward on violin, Tom Stone on second violin, Ethan Filner on viola, and Jennifer Kloetzel on cello.  

It had been nearly twenty years since I attended a concert in the Maybeck Recital Hall. I recall hearing a classical guitar recital here during jazz pianist Dick Wittington’s tenure as resident owner of the Maybeck Recital Hall. This intimate space, lovingly built by Bernard Maybeck in 1914, was conceived as a studio for the piano teacher Alma Kennedy, who gave lessons here to the daughter of the Nixon family who lived next door. Alma Kennedy lived in the small studio apartment that is part of the Recital Hall. The original Recital Hall burned down in the 1923 fire that also claimed the nearby Hillside Club; and, like the Hillside Club, it was rebuilt in 1923 according to Maybeck’s original design.  

Regular readers of the Berkeley Daily Planet will know that I have often railed against performances of chamber music in cavernous auditoriums such as Zellerbach Hall, and I have championed Maybeck’s Hillside Club as an ideal venue for chamber music. However, on hearing the Cypress String Quartet in the even more intimate Maybeck Recital Hall, I now champion this venue as the ideal space for chamber music. Quite a bit smaller than the Hillside Club, which holds 200 persons when set up in concert format, the Maybeck Recital Hall holds about 40 persons. The sense of immediacy here is unparalleled.  

Prior to opening the concert with Beethoven’s Op. 18 Quartet, No. 1, violinist Cecily Ward spoke about this work, which was actually composed after the Op. 18, No. 3 Quartet. Beethoven published this as No. 1, Ward maintained, specifically because this work demonstrates all that Beethoven had learned from the string quartets of Haydn and Mozart. The opening movement, Ward explained, is built on a five-note sequence that recurs repeatedly throughout this movement; and she invited cellist Jennifer Kloetzel to play this five-note sequence. As we subsequently heard, Beethoven explores this sequence of notes in many variations, some of them quite witty. The Adagio second movement, inspired by the tomb scene in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, opens with cello, viola and second violin playing melancholy low notes, soon joined by the first violin playing a yearning motif above the bass. Long, expansive melodies follow, occasionally broken by moments of silence. Towards the end of this movement, the cello states a last romantic theme, then the music cascades in a descent played first by the viola, then by the second violin, and, finally, by the first violin. The third movement, a scherzo, breaks the mood of gloom and establishes a witty, playful mood. The final movement, marked Allegro, pays homage to Mozart’s D-major Quartet, K. 499, and ends with a coda in which Beethoven explores counterpoint in a witty and imaginative manner. Hearing the Cypress Quartet play this work in the intimate and inviting space of the Maybeck Recital Hall was a wonderful experience. In this wood-paneled hall enlivened by tall Gothic-style leaded-glass windows culminating in pointed arches, the immediacy of the music was very powerful. Fortissimo attacks made a visceral impact on the listener. One felt the music in one’s guts. 

The same could be said, but in spades, for the Op. 130 Quartet in B-flat, which was played after intermission. This monumental work in six movements is a truly revolutionary piece of music, especially when it is played as Beethoven originally intended with Die Große Fugue as the final movement. To their immense credit, the Cypress Quartet played it this way, and the stark power of this amazing work shone through in every measure. The opening Adagio, ma non troppo-Allegro, is a very expansive movement, and it is full of brooding recollections of sorrow and suffering amidst agitated outbursts of raw pain. The second movement, a brief Presto, features a lively scherzo that simply expresses the exuberance of joyful music-making. However, I did note that on three occasions when the first violin reached for the highest note, Cecily Ward’s top note was a bit shrill. The third movement is marked Poco scherzoso, and it features pizzicato plucking from the three low-pitched instruments, while the first violin works the high range. Next comes a rustic German dance movement, marked Alla danza tedesca. Here Beethoven introduces high-stepping dance rhythms, then embarks on a series of intellectual variations on the basic theme. However, Beethoven suddenly slows everything down, and the cello plays the basic theme in a slow, poignant manner, as if the composer suddenly realized his own intellectual distance from this rustic dance and the sense of community such a country dance presupposes. After one last reiteration of the dance music, Beethoven launches into the next movement, the heart-rending Cavatina. 

Into this Cavatina Beethoven poured all the pain and suffering he had experienced in his life – the struggle with deafness, the repeated disappointments in love, and the sense of lonely isolation stemming both from his deafness and from the immense gap between his own exalted notion of music and the more pedestrian expectations of his public. The tragedy expressed in the Cavatina, according to J.W.N. Sullivan, is the “yearning for the unattainable, for that close human intimacy, that love and sympathy, that Beethoven never experienced.” Beethoven’s friend Karl Holz reported that the composer “wrote the Cavatina (‘short aria’) amid sorrows and tears; never did his music breathe so heart-felt an inspiration, and even the memory of this movement brought tears to his eyes.”  

After the pain and sorrow of the Cavatina, Beethoven needed something that would express the overcoming of all obstacles and a reaffirmation of life. What Beethoven turned to was Bach and the fugue. By going back to the roots of classical music, Beethoven took on the task of demonstrating that in his mastery of counterpoint he found his reaffirmation of life and his overcoming of all obstacles. As played here by the Cypress String Quartet, Die Große Fugue was an overwhelming tour de force, bringing this Op. 130 Quartet to a triumphant close. 

As an encore, the Cypress Quartet played the somewhat different fugue that closes Beethoven’s earlier Op. 59, No. 3 Quartet. All in all, I exited the Maybeck Recital Hall feeling I had just experienced one of the greatest concerts I’ve ever attended.