Page One

Proud to be a citizen of Berkeley 

Editor: 

I am troubled by local reaction to Dona Spring’s alleged statement comparing the actions of our federal government to those of a terrorist state. I find it troubling that the response from mainstream media might intimidate a public figure from speaking the truth as she sees it.  

I am troubled that other elected officials exploit the situation to embarrass a colleague. I am troubled that our mayor is embarrassed by the words of our elected leaders who speak from the conviction of their moral conscience. 

What makes Berkeley a beacon throughout this country is its historical willingness to challenge mainstream posturing that perpetuates national arrogance and self-righteousness.  

If leaders and citizens of Berkeley fail to hold up the mirror of accountability, where else in the United States will people ask the hard questions? 

Our mayor continues to remind us that this is not the 60’s. I agree; we have lost the innocence of the 60’s. But hopefully we have gained wisdom to recognize a familiar path our country has tread too many times in the past four decades. Whether Dona Spring said it or not, many of us who examine the evidence recognize this country’s acts of terrorism against innocent civilians in the Middle East and in other third world countries. 

I am troubled by a reported statement that suggests the mayor of Berkeley is embarrassed by our most valuable characteristics – our moral conscience and our willingness to stand up for it. That Barbara Lee and Dona Spring draw attention to our city because they speak from moral conscience brings pride to our city.  

At times throughout my adult life I have traveled outside the United States – in Europe, during two Republican administrations’ bombing of Libya and Iraq, and again while a Democratic administration bombed Kosovo. At those times I was ashamed to admit I was from the United States; I have never been ashamed to say I am from Berkeley. 

Pamela Webster 

Berkeley 

Blame bin Laden for death of civilians 

The Daily Planet received the following letter addressed to Councilmember Dona Spring: 

While you have a right to your opinion, I do not believe you have a right to inflict your opinion on the city and citizens of Berkeley as an elected representative. Have you consulted with the people of Berkeley as to their opinions on the U.S. war on terrorism? 

There comes a time when talk and coalitions cease to be effective. The terrorist acts upon the United States were unmerciful, violent attempts to destroy our country by destroying our freedoms. No terrorist involved cared about the lives they ended and the many more lives that they have tragically affected forever. No, the majority of the citizens of Afghanistan are not responsible for Sept. 11 or what terror may come to the United States. And no, they should not have to die because of what some of their countryman did.  

But it is not the United States killing Afghan civilians. It is Osma bin Laden and his organization who are killing them. (Why would we be bombing Afghanistan if it weren’t for bin Laden?) I think they want to get rid of bin Laden almost as much as we do. You have to understand – bin Laden et.al. do not comprehend diplomacy. They do not want to solve anything peacefully. The man is using his religion as a front for his evil. He is not capable of compromise or working toward a common goal unless that goal is to tear down the United States. At the same time he denounces our “system,” he uses that same system for profit to fund his campaign against us. By the way, do you really think he or members of his organization would ever keep their diplomatic word? Come now. 

What you are asking the city manager and ultimately the people of Berkeley to do is to join bin Laden’s side–work to divide our country instead of being the kind of patriots our Founding Fathers were and support our president. Does “Give me Liberty or give me death” ring a (Liberty) bell? I think you should reevaluate what you are in office to do, how you were even afforded the opportunity to hold office via our government structure and uphold the Constitution of the United States instead of work to tear it down. 

Becky Kaiser 

Bakersfield  

Follow the money 

Editor: 

While all the news reporters watch and report on every bright flash of light, every loud explosion, why aren’t they covering, with equal ferocity, the war on terrorist finances?  

Like any organization, the far-flung network of terrorists needs money to function. Who is reporting and watching whether our government is going after their stock accounts, banks, and trading companies with an equal ferocity that we launch jets with big bombs? 

The terrorists hit the World Trade Center because it is a symbol of the global economy. So, let’s give them what they want, let’s unplug them from their money. 

Responsible journalism should keep watch that Bush’s war on terrorism is being fought where the action is, and not just focus on watching rubble bounce. Afghanistan is a side show, how about reporting on the Main Event? 

Bruce Joffe 

Piedmont 

International law should rule 

Editor: 

We killed the messenger of bad news and learned very little from his message; certainly not enough to prevent what happened on Sept. 11, 2000.  

He was a U.S. combat-veteran awarded for bravery in action, who bombed a federal government building in Oklahoma City in protest against his government’s action in Waco, Texas, when it killed 80 men, women and children in the Davidian community that was not threatening our national security in any way requiring their obliteration. 

We should have learned then that we needed to mend our ways and stop trying to dominate the world with our super military might. 

I believe the sponsors of the multiple murders and massive destructive actions in New York, Washington, D.C. (actually Arlington, Virginia) and Pennsylvania, must be identified and arrested by United Nations action since all of its members have declared themselves opposed to barbarism and terrorism, and we should add: militarism (namely war-waging and preparations for the same, to which the 1945 U.N. Charter refers as a “scourge” from which “succeeding generations should be saved”): I repeat: action that consists in and amounts to effective global police action, as noted above. 

Timothy McVeigh took the law into his own hands and made a terrible mistake for which he paid with his own life. No person nor gang of persons, nor a single nation or gang of nations, should make that mistake and risk the lives of the world’s people and their ways of life in so doing.  

The 9/11 killers self-destructed. Arresting the sponsors requires super global police action by the United Nations. 

Alfred C. Williams 

Member, World Community Advocates, 

Unitarian Universalist Center,  

San Francisco